期刊文献+

港航上市公司成本效率评价 被引量:4

Evaluation on cost efficiency of listed port and shipping companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对港航企业在迅猛发展、取得良好的经济效益的同时,很少对成本进行探讨和评价的状况,运用随机前沿分析(Stochastic Frontier Analysis,SFA)理论建立成本效率评价模型,选取10个港航上市公司2001—2006年的面板数据,对其成本效率进行评价;发现港航上市公司的成本效率水平虽然逐年递增,但整体还不高,有较大的提升空间.从港航上市公司的长远发展来看,应进一步开源节流,控制总成本. In view of the condition that the listed port and shipping companies seldom carry out cost evaluation and analysis while achieving a favorable profit by the rapid development, a cost efficiency evaluation model based on the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) theory is built. Ten listed port and shipping companies' cost efficieneies are evaluated according to their panel data from the year 2001 to 2006. It is pointed out that although the cost efficiency level of these listed port and shipping companies has been increasing gradually year by year, there is still comparatively large space for further improvement, broadening sources of income as well as reducing expenditure, and controlling the overall cost should be done in the long run.
作者 叶伟龙
出处 《上海海事大学学报》 北大核心 2010年第1期56-60,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Maritime University
关键词 港口 航运 上市公司 成本效率 随机前沿分析 port shipping listed company cost efficiency stochastic frontier analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献18

  • 1郗永勤.DEA方法在煤炭企业有效性评价中的应用研究(上)[J].煤炭经济研究,1994,14(1):20-22. 被引量:3
  • 2魏晓平,王立宝.基于DEA模型的煤炭行业上市公司经营效率评价[J].统计与决策,2005,21(12X):61-63. 被引量:19
  • 3庞瑞芝,子璇(校对).我国主要沿海港口的动态效率评价[J].经济研究,2006,41(6):92-100. 被引量:140
  • 4Aigner, D , C A K LoveU and P Schmidt, 1977, Formtdation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models, Journal of Econometrics 6, 21 - 37.
  • 5Bauer, P , A.Betger and D Humphrey, 1993, Efficiency and productivity growth in U.S.banking, in: H.O. Ffied, C A K Lovell and S S Schmidt, eds., The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications ( Oxford University Press, Oxford).
  • 6Berger,A N , W C Hunter and S G Timme, 1993a, The efficiency of financial institutions: A review and preview of research, past, present and future, Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 221 - 250.
  • 7Evaaoff, D D , Israflevieh, P R , 1995. Scale elasticity versus scale efficiency in baaking. Southem Journal d Ecoaoraics 61,1036 - 1047.
  • 8Mester, L J , 1996. A study of bank efficiency taking into account risk - preferences. Journal of Banking and Finance 20, 1025- 1045.
  • 9Cobenoyan, A: S. , Cooperman, E. S. , Register, C. A. and Hudgins, S. C. The relative cost efficiency of stock versus mutual S&L: a stochastic cost frontier approach [ J ]. Journal of Financial services Research, 1990. 7,151-70.
  • 10Esho, N. and Sharpe, I. G. X-efficiency of Australian permanent building societies[ J ]. The Economic Record,Vo1:71,1996,246 -59.

共引文献133

同被引文献56

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部