期刊文献+

经桡动脉及股动脉途径急诊介入治疗STEMI的对照研究 被引量:14

Control study on treatment of STEMI by emergency transradial or transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经桡动脉急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗ST段抬高急性心肌梗死(STEMI)的临床疗效及可行性。方法STEMI行急诊PCI患者225例,随机分为桡动脉组123例,股动脉组102例。分析两组患者介入治疗的成功率、疗效、手术时间和术后并发症的发生率。结果两组患者在心肌梗死部位、血管病变位置、严重程度等方面,差异均无统计学意义。股动脉组PCI成功率为92.3%,桡动脉组为94.3%,两组之间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。桡动脉组术后并发症发生率(6.5%)明显低于股动脉组(16.7%,P<0.05)。结论经桡动脉途径行急诊PCI治疗STEMI与经股动脉途径PCI成功率相似,而术后并发症少,值得临床推广。 Objective To discuss the clinical effect and feasibility of emergency transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Methods The patients with STEMI after PCI (n=225) were randomly divided into the transradial group (n=123) and transfemoral group (n=102).The success rate,curative effect,operation time and incidence of post-operation complications were compared and analysed in two groups.Results There was no statistical difference in the comparison of degree and location of STEMI and vascular pathological changes between two groups.The success rate of PCI was 92.3% in the transfemoral group and 94.3% in the transradial group.There was not different statistically (P0.05) between two groups.The incidence of post-operation complications was lower significantly in the transradial group (6.5%) than that in the transfemoral group (16.7%,P0.05).Conclusion The success rate of treatment of STEMI with emergency transradial PCI is similar to that with transfemoral PCI,and transradial PCI has less post-operation complications.It is worth popularizing in clinic.
出处 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》 2010年第1期25-27,共3页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
关键词 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 桡动脉 股动脉 心肌梗死 急救医疗服务 Angioplasty transluminal percutaneous Radical artery Femoral artery Acute myocardial infarction Emergency medical services
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Campeau L.Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1989,16:3-7.
  • 2Saito S,Tanaka S,Hiroe Y,et al.Comparative study on transradial approach vs.transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction:results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2003,59:26-33.
  • 3Sunami K,Saito S,Tanaka S.Successful transradial coronary angioplasty and stenting using a self-expandable RADIUS stent to the anomalous left main coronary artery.J Invasive Cardiol,2003,15:46-48.
  • 4Ziakas A,Klinke P,Mildenberger R,et al.Comparison of the radial and the femoral approaches in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol,2003,91:598-600.
  • 5Louvard Y,Benamer H,Garot P,et al.Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study).Am J Cardiol,2004,94:1177-1180.
  • 6Cantor WJ,Puley G,Natarajan MK,et al.Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction-the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial.Am Heart J,2005,150:543-549.

同被引文献89

引证文献14

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部