“私法与国家”框架下的“民事政策”

"Civil Policy" under the Framework of "Private Law and State"

"民事政策"困境的解决和其蕴含的价值有赖于对"私法与国家"这一问题阈的探究,而兼顾管制和自治的"中立性的民法"理论妥当地确立了民法和国家关系,从而不仅为"国家政策能否成为民法法源"提供了理论回答,还为"国家政策如何成为民法法源"提供了指引:即在"有无法律漏洞存在"和"有无可得适用的民事政策存在"的双重控制的前提下,对民事政策进行谨慎的"合目的性的解释",以实现私法自治和国家管制的平衡。

Both the solution of dilemma and the value of'civil policy'lie in the exploration to the problem domain of'Private law and State'.'Neutral Civil Law' which gives consideration to Regulation and Autonomy appropriately defines the relationship between civil law and the state,therefore,it not only theatrically answers the question whether the state policy is the source of civil law,but also directs the way the state policy comes into the source of civil law,that is,in order to keep balance of private law autonomy and state regulation,we should employ the'purposive interpretation method' to civil policy prudently on the premise of'dual controlling',which means to verify whether there is the legal loophole and whether there is the applicative civil policy as well.