博士质量观及其差异性的实证分析——基于全国所有博士培养单位的调查被引量：12

下载PDF

导出

摘要从不同的角度出发,人们对博士培养质量的评价标准,即所持的质量观,主要可以归纳为学术成果导向的质量观、职业导向的质量观、学术训练导向的质量观和效益导向的质量观。文章通过实证研究发现,在评价博士质量时,受教育者(博士生和毕业博士)与和教育者(博士生导师和研究生教育负责人)普遍高度重视博士生的创新能力和科研能力,但对博士生相关学科知识和学位论文质量重要性的认识存在明显差异。同时,不同学科博士生和博士生导师对学位论文质量的重视程度也存在明显的差异。

作者沈文钦赵世奎

机构地区北京大学教育学院北京航空航天大学高等教育研究所

出处《教育学术月刊》北大核心 2010年第1期21-24,共4页 Education Research Monthly

基金北京市与中央在京院校共建项目北京市教育科学规划青年专项课题"博士生培养模式的多样化国际化与结构化趋势"(课题编号CAD09049)

关键词博士教育博士质量博士质量观差异性

分类号 G643 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献7

1沈文钦.博士培养质量评价:概念、方法与视角[J].北京大学教育评论,2009,7(2):47-59. 被引量：38
2Monaghan, P.(1989, March). Some fields are reassessing the value of the traditional doctoral dissertation. TheChronicle of Higher Education, p.A1.
3Sverker S?rlin, Peder Andersen, Holst Bodil, Mads Krogsgaard Thomsen, Morten Levin. A public good:PhD education in Denmark, report from an international evaluation panel . Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation,2006.
4Deem, Rosemary; Brehony, Kevin J. (2000). Doctoral Students' Access to Research Cultures are some more unequal than others? Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 25 Issue 2, 149,17.
5Richelle Brooks & Donna Heiland.. Assessment and Doctoral Education :Recommendations for moving forward..European Journal of Education, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2007:351-362.
6William G.Bowen & Neil L. Rudenstine.In pursuit of the PhD. Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press,1992.
7Nyquist, J. & Woodford, B.J. (2000). Re-envisioning the PhD: What concerns do we have? Retrieved January 2004, from http:// depts.washington.edu/envision/index.html.

二级参考文献33

1William Clark. (2006). Academic charisma and the origins of the research university. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2006 : 192-194.
2Simpson, R. (1983). How the PhD came to Britain: A century of struggle for postgraduate education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education. :135.
3Thomas B. Hoffer. (2004). Doctorate recipients from United States universities: Summary report 2004,Chicago: National Opinion Research Centre.
4Ives, Glenice. (2002) . The PhD Supervisory Relationship and Process. Monash University, unpublished dissertation.
5Burgess, R.G. . (1994). Postgraduate Education and Training in the Social Sciences: processes and products. London, Jessica Kingsley.
6Delamont, S. , Atkinson, P. , & Perry, O. (2000). The doctoral experience: Success and failure in graduate school. London: Falmer Press.
7Cartter, Allan Murray. (1976). Ph.D. 's and the academic labor market: a report prepared for the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8William G. Bowen & Neil L. Rudenstine. (1992) . In pursuit of the PhD. Princeton, N. J. : Princeton University Press.
9Ostriker, J. , & Kuh, CV (Eds.). (2003). Assessing research-doctorate programs: A methodology study. Washington, DC: National Academies Press,9.
10Picciano, Joseph, Elizabeth Rudd, Emory Morrison, and Maresi Nerad. (2007). Social Science PhDs-Five + Years. Out: Survey Methods. CIRGE Report 2007-01.