期刊文献+

美国加州、香港和上海高中物理课程评价的比较 被引量:2

The Comparison of High School Physics Curriculum Evaluation Between California, Hong Kong and Shanghai
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国加州、香港和上海高中物理课程的评价内容、评价的侧重点、倡导的评价方式各具特色。课程评价比较的启示为:课程评价要体现物理课程标准的权威性;在与标准文本的一致性与互补性之间保持平衡;注意课程评价在实际运作中的可操作性。 The high scunique in the aspects of contents, special emphasis and patterns. The implication of the hool physics curriculum evaluations of California, Hong Kong and Shanghai are comparison is that curriculum evaluation should embody the authority of the physics curriculum standards, maintain a balance between the complementary and the consistency of the standard text and pay attention to the actual operation.
作者 张恩德
出处 《教育学术月刊》 北大核心 2010年第2期98-100,共3页 Education Research Monthly
基金 华东师范大学"上海市新一轮基础教育课程改革咨询研究项目"(物理学科)课题的研究成果之一 课题编号:4805D112
关键词 物理课程 课程评价 课程标准 Physics Curriculum Curriculum Evaluation Curriculum Standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1顾明远.教育大辞典(第一卷)[M].上海教育出版社,1990.181.
  • 2美国国家研究理事会 戢守志等(译).美国国家科学教育标准[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999..
  • 3张华.课程与教学论[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2003.71.
  • 4Chael R. Matthews. How History and Philosophy in the US Science Education Standards Could Have Promoted Multidisciplinary Teaching [ J ]. School Science and Mathematics, 1998(6):285-293.
  • 5Michael R. Matthews. Methodology and Politics in Science: The Fate of Huygens' 1673 Proposal of the Seconds Pendulum as an International Standard of Length and Some Educational Suggestions ? [J] . Science and Education, 2001. 10: 119-135.
  • 6Donald Macnab. Raising Standards in Mathematics Education : Values, Vision, and Timss [J]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2000. 42: 61-80.
  • 7Pushkin, Dave. A theoretical Nature of the National Science Education Standards: There's more Theory than We Think-A Response to Thomas Shiland[J]. Science Education, 2002. 86(2): 161-167.
  • 8David Kumar and Donna Berlin. A Study of STS Themes in State Science Curriculum Frameworks in the United States[J]. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1998. 7(2): 191-197.
  • 9Olga Maia Amaral and Leslie Garrison. Missing the Forest for the Trees[J] . Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2006.
  • 10Rose M. Pringle and Sarah Carrier Martin. The Potential Impacts of Upcoming High-Stakes Testing on the Teaching of Science in Elementary Classrooms[J]. Research in Science Education, 2005. 35: 347-361.

共引文献78

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部