期刊文献+

变截面吊车梁圆弧式和直角式突变支座的受力性能分析 被引量:13

Mechanical Analysis of Arc-Shape and Right-Angle Supports of Crane Girders with Variable Cross Sections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用圆弧式突变支座的变截面吊车梁在实际工程中出现了普遍性的疲劳裂缝,而直角式突变支座则未发现这类问题。现针对这两类变截面的吊车梁进行有限元分析,比较和探讨其截面突变处的局部应力状态和力学性能。分析结果表明,圆弧式突变支座翼缘与腹板连接处可形成两个方向较大的主应力,应力集中严重,在动荷载作用下易成为疲劳破坏的薄弱点,而直角式突变的梁中应力集中情况得到了较大的缓和。因此,在工程设计中,尤其是涉及动力荷载时,变截面梁支座构造形式不宜采用圆弧式,直角式应是一种良好的替代。 Prevailing fatigue cracking has been witnessed in practical variable cross section crane girders with the arc-shape support detail, while not in those with the right-angle support detail. Finite element (FE) analyses were performed on variable cross section crane girders with the two types of support details to compare and investigate the local stress state and mechanical performance. FE analysis results indicated that principle stresses in the two directions are considerably high at the connecting area between the flange and web of the arc-shape support and stress concentration is significant, so that fatigue failure may occur at this point under dynamic loading, while for the right-angle support stress concentration is mitigated. As a result, it is recommended to adopt the right-angle support to replace the arc-shape detail for practical engineering designs, especially in dynamic loading conditions.
出处 《结构工程师》 2010年第1期22-27,共6页 Structural Engineers
基金 上海市优秀科委学科带头人项目"工业建筑钢结构抗震设计成套技术研究"(09XD1420500)
关键词 吊车梁 变截面 圆弧式突变支座 直角式突变支座 有限元分析 疲劳 crane girder, variable cross section, arc-shape support, right-angle support, finite element analysis, fatigue
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献17

  • 1卢铁鹰,赵清,卢平.钢吊车梁直角式突变支座疲劳性能试验研究[J].重庆建筑工程学院学报,1994,16(3):39-48. 被引量:13
  • 2陈夏新 戴福忠.铁路钢筋混凝土梁钢筋疲劳可靠评估[C]..《工程结构可靠性》全国第三届学术交流会议论文集[C].南京,1992年..
  • 3陈厦新 戴福忠 中国土木工程学会桥梁及结构工程学会结构可靠度.常用铁路桥梁疲劳可靠度研究[C].中国土木工程学会桥梁及结构工程学会结构可靠度委员会.全国第四届学术交流会议[C].西安,1995..
  • 4.“宝钢一炼钢主厂房吊车梁圆弧端疲劳剩余寿命评估及加固技术研究[R]”[R].国家工业建筑诊断与改造工程技术研究中心,2001.1..
  • 5ISO2394.国际标准《结构可靠性总原则》[S].[S].,1998..
  • 6The Committee on Fatigue and Fracture Reliability of the Committee on Structural Safety and Reliability of the Structural Division. Fatigue reliability: Introduction [J]. Journal of the Structural Division, 1982, 108 (ST1): 323.
  • 7The Committee on Fatigue and Fracture Reliability of the Committee on Strucnnal Safety and Reliability of the Structmal Division. Fatigue reliability: Quality assurance and maintainability [ J]. Journal of the Structural Division, 1982, 108 (ST1) : 24-46.
  • 8The Committee on Fatigue and Fracture Reliability of the Committee on Structural Safety and Reliability of the Structural Division. Fatigue reliability: Variable amplitude loading [ J ]. Journal of the Structural Division, 1982, 108 (ST1): 47-69.
  • 9The Committee on Fatigue and Fracture Rehabihty of the Committee on Structural Safety and Reliability of the Structural Division. Fatigue reliability: Development of criteria for design [J]. Journal of the Structural Division, 1982, 108 (ST1): 70 - 88.
  • 10William G Byers, Mark J Marley, Jamshid Mohammadi, Richard J Nielsen and Shahram Sarkarfi. Fatigue rdiability reassessment procedures : State-of-the-art paper [ J ]. J Struct Engrg, ASCE, 1997, 123 (3): 271 - 276.

共引文献49

同被引文献47

引证文献13

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部