期刊文献+

免辅助切口腹腔镜手术治疗低位直肠癌 被引量:3

Incisionless laparoscopic excision of low rectal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨免辅助切口腹腔镜对低位直肠癌行根治术的可行性及近期临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2002-2005年行腹腔镜免辅助切口对低位直肠癌行根治术69例的临床资料(研究组),并与同期68例行辅助切口腹腔镜低位直肠癌术(对照组)进行对比研究。统计学分析:计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用x。检验。结果两组均顺利行直肠癌根治性切除,保肛率100%,无中转开腹及严重并发症。对照组和研究组手术时间分别为(150±25)min和(130±22)rain(t=4.97,P〈0.05),住院费用分别为(17900±850)元和(9900±750)元(t=58.43,P〈0.05),腹部切口长度分别为(5±1.5)cm和0cm(t=27.69,P〈0.05)。对照组与研究组术中出血量分别为(75±26)ml和(77±23)ml(t=0.47,P〉0.05),清除淋巴结数量分别为(11.5±2.3)枚和(12.1±1.6)枚(t=1.77,P〉0.05),切除标本长度为(15.5±3.2)cm和(15.8±3.5)cm(t=0.52,P〉0.05),肿瘤下缘距远切端距离为(2.5±0.6)cm和(2.6±0.5)cm(t=1.06,P〉0.05)。术后胃肠功能恢复时间分别为(48±2.3)h和(48±3.1)h(t=0.00,P〉0.05),手术后镇痛剂使用率分别为88%和86%(χ2=0.05,P〉0.05)。所有患者均获随访45~79(平均59.9)个月。研究组术后9个月排便功能基本正常。两组1、3年肿瘤复发率分别为0、0和3%、1%,1、3年生存率分别为99%、97%和96%、96%,差异无统计学意义(x。=0.00、0.32、0.35、0.15,P〉0.05)。结论免辅助切口腹腔镜低位直肠癌手术符合肿瘤学根治的原则,具有可行性。与传统腹腔镜术式相比,该技术节省手术时间及住院费用。 Objective To study the feasibility and curative effect of incisionless laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of low rectal carcinoma in which an abdominoperineal resection was conducted without an accessory incision for the removal of the tumor containing bowel segment. Methods From January 2002 to January 2005, 69 low rectal carcinoma ( 〈 7 cm from the anal verge) patients undergoing incisionless laparoscopic total mesorectal excision ( study group), in comparison with 68 patients receiving traditional laparoscopic assisted total mesorectal excision ( control group ). The operative procedures,clinicopathological data and short-term outcomes were compared. Results All the patients accepted laparoscopic operation successfully. The operating time in control group and study group was (150 ± 25 ) min versus ( 130 ± 22 ) min ( t = 4. 97, P 〈 0. 05 ), the hospital fee was ( 17900 ± 850 ) RMB yuan versus (9900 ±750) RMB yuan (t =58. 43, P 〈0. 05), the length of abdomen incision was (5 ± 1.5) cm versus 0 cm ( t = 27.69, P 〈 0. 05 ), the blood loss was (75 ± 26) ml versus (77 ± 23 ) ml (t = 0.47, P 〉 0. 05 ), the number of lymph node dissected was (11.5±2.3) versus (12.1±1.6) (t=1.77, P〉0.05), the resected specimen length was (15.5 ±3.2) cm versus (15.8 ±3.5) cm (t =0.52, P 〉0.05), the negative distal margin was ( 2. 5 ± 0. 6 ) cm versus ( 2. 6 ± 0. 5 ) cm ( t = 1.06, P 〉 0. 05 ), the time of bowel function recovery was ( 48 ± 2. 3 ) h versus (48 ± 3.1 ) h ( t = 0.00, P 〉 0. 05 ) and the use of analgetics was 88% versus 86% (χ2 =0. 05 ,P 〉 0.05 ). All the patients were followed-up from 45 months to 79 months (average 59.9 months). The 1-,3-year recurrent rate and survival rate were 0.3% and 99%, 96% in study group, and those in the control group were 0.1% and 97%, 96% respectively, with the difference being not significant (χ2 = 0.00, 0.32, 0.35, 0. 15, P 〉 0.05). Patients in both group all regained satisfactory bowel continence 9 months after operation. Conclusions Incisionless laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with anal preservation is in line with oncologic principle, and a safe and feasible approach to the surgical treatment of lower rectal cancer, with the advantage of shorter operation time, shorter hospital fee and more cosmetic.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期137-140,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 直肠肿瘤 全直肠系膜切除术 Laparoscopy Rectal neoplasms Total mesorectal excision
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Rullier E, Zebib F, Laurent C, et at. Intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004, 47: 459- 466.
  • 2胡建昆,周总光,陈志新,王兰兰,于永扬,刘瑾,张波,李立,陈佳平.腹腔镜和开腹直肠癌全直肠系膜切除对机体免疫功能的影响[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(2):88-90. 被引量:10
  • 3Rullier E, Sa Cunha A, Couderc P, et al. Laparoscopie intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and low rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2003, 90: 445-451.
  • 4骆成玉,季晓昕,张键,关琛,林华,杨齐,丁毅,薛镭,潘邦杰,张勇智.腹腔镜直肠手术的解剖学特点及应用意义[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(3):158-160. 被引量:8
  • 5Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg, 2003, 237: 335-342.

二级参考文献15

  • 1郑民华.腹腔镜结直肠手术的现状与评价[J].中国微创外科杂志,2002,2(z1):25-25. 被引量:4
  • 2Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM,et al.Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc, 2003,17:1530-1535.
  • 3Patankar SK, Larach SW, Ferrara A,et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period.Dis Colon Rectum,2003 ,46:601-611.
  • 4Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endos,2004,18:281-289.
  • 5Bacal D. Experience with laparoscopic medial and lateral dissection of the rectosigmoid for cancer. World J Surg,2003,27:1337-1338.
  • 6Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, et al. Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003,46:503-509.
  • 7Kiran RP, Delaney CD, Senagore AJ, et al. Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg,2004 ,139:39-42.
  • 8Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, et al. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg, 2002 ,89:1551-1556.
  • 9Uyama I, Sugioka A, Matsui H, et al. Laparoscopic lateral node dissection with autonomic nerve preservation for advanced lower rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg, 2001,193:579-584.
  • 10Walker CBJ;Bruce DM;Heys SD.Minimal modulation of lymphocyte and natural killer cell subsets following minimal access surgery[J],1999.

共引文献16

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部