摘要
如何处理公正审判同新闻自由间的矛盾是无论何种形式的司法系统都面临着的一个挑战。本文将目光投向了时常被主流文献所忽略的大陆法国家规制庭审前新闻报道的立法与司法实践,着重介绍了这些国家对于诉讼参与人个人名誉与尊严的保护。通过对美国的协调方法、英国的保护主义模式,以及欧洲大陆国家禁止的立场的比较分析,为各国在新闻自由、司法公正和诉讼参与人的人格利益中找到一种合理的平衡提供了一个全新的视角。
How to deal with the conflict between fair trial and the freedom of media is a challenge that almost every jurisdiction face.This article focuses some Continental European experience of pretrial court-related speech restraints,which usually disregarded by the mainstream literature,focuses on civil-law systems,which pay greater attention to safeguard the dignitarial interests of trial participants.It has contrasted three models:the American neutralizing approach,the English protective model,and the Continental preventive stance and offers s new perspective on finding an acceptable balance among free press,fair trials,and the personality interests.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期29-38,共10页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
国家211工程第三期建设项目“转型期法治的理论、制度和实验”
浙江省钱江人才计划项目“司法与民意和谐的程序机制”的阶段性成果之一
