期刊文献+

司法中群体观念的形成机制——司法如何应对民意的前提考量 被引量:11

How Group Attitudes Come into Being:An Obligatory Question before We Know How to Deal with Public Opinion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探究司法如何应对民意,就必须加强对民意形成过程的认识和理解。"群体极化"理论对网络时代的民意形成机制有较强的解释力。理论上,群体极化效应主要由两个机制形成:名誉机制和信息机制。中国因其国情也给群体极化效应提供了特殊要素,尤其是互联网时代的交流模式加剧了群体观念极化的频繁发生。本文以论述"群体极化效应"为主线,加入对关于民意形成机制的其他成果的简单综述,以期能够引起法学界对民意本身的重视。 We have to understand the mechanism of how group attitudes come into being before we figure out how to deal with public opinion.'Group Polarization' has been one of the most constructive theories on this issue.Two elements play important parts in group polarization.They are Social Comparison and Persuasive Argument Theory.China's historical and social condition offers special factors during group polarization.In the era of Internet,group polarization becomes more and more frequent because of the internet-based communication.Considering China's complex reality,this article will be helpful for Chinese learners to understand why public opinion is dangerous for justice.
作者 姜斌
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期45-50,共6页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 国家211工程第三期建设项目"转型期法治的理论 制度和实验" 浙江省钱江人才计划项目"司法与民意和谐的程序机制"的阶段性成果之一
关键词 民意 群体极化 网络民意 司法 Public Opinion,Group Polarization,Internet Communication,Judiciary
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1仓朝武等译.《设计民主:论宪法的作用》.
  • 2David Isenberg, "Group Polarization: A Critical Review and Meta - analysis," 50 J, Personality and Soc. Psych, 1141 (1986).
  • 3J. A. F. Stoner, "A Comparison of Individual and Group Decisions Including Risk" ( 1962 ) ( unpublished master' s thesis, School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
  • 4J. A. F. Stoner, "Risky and Cautious Shifts in Group Decisions", 4 J, Experimental Social Psych. 442 ( 1968 ).
  • 5Dean G. Pruitt, "Choice Shifts in Group Discussion: An Introductory Review, "20 J, Personality and Soc. Psych, 339 - 360 ( 1971 ).
  • 6Moscovici, S. , & Zavalloni, M. , "The group as a polarizer of attitudes," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 12, 125 - 135(1969).
  • 7David Isenberg, " Group Polarization: A Critical Review and Meta-analysis", 50 J, Personality and Soc. Psych. 1141 (1986), and Roger Brown, Social Psychology 222 (New York: The Free Press, 1986), 210-225.
  • 8Leon Festinger. "A theory of social comparison processes". Human Relations, 7 (2) 117 - 140 (1954).
  • 9Wikipedia "词条" Group Polarization".
  • 10Cass Sunstein, Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do, 26 - 28, ( Oxford University Press, 2001 ).

二级参考文献57

共引文献70

同被引文献124

引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部