摘要
目的研究系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)病人抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)的阳性率及其特异性靶抗原。方法对95例有肾活检资料的狼疮肾炎病人血清系统地应用间接免疫荧光法(IF)及抗原特异性ELISA法检测了ANCA。ELISA法应用的抗原为高度纯化的六种已知ANCA靶抗原:蛋白酶3(PR3)、髓过氧化物酶(MPO)、杀菌/通透性增高蛋白(BPI)、人白细胞弹力蛋白酶(HLE)、组蛋白酶G(CG)和乳铁蛋白(LF),并比较肾活检的病理活动指标是否与ANCA相关。结果(1)无一例血清识别PR3、MPO;仅1例识别BPI;62.1%(59/95)的SLE病人血清识别CG,部分血清滴度可达1/3200;少数血清识别LF(8/95,8.4%)。(2)应用IF法,仅22%为单纯ANCA阳性。(3)对抗CG抗体而言,肾脏病理有活动指标者的阳性率为73.8%(48/65),而无活动病变者则为36.7%(11/30),二者差异有极显著意义(χ2=12056,P<0.0001);而抗LF抗体则与病变活动无相关。结论(1)多数狼疮肾炎患者血清中存在ANCA,CG为其主要靶抗原且抗CG抗体与肾脏病理活动相关,并进一步提示应重视抗胞浆抗体?
Objective To investigate the prevalence of ANCA and their target antigens in Chinese patients with lupus nephritis (LN) and to find the association between ANCA and active renal pathological lesions. Methods 95 serum samples were collected from 95 renal biopsy proven LN patients and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) using ethanol fixed leukocytes as substrate and ELISA using six highly purified known ANCA antigens as solid phase ligands were performed. The specific ANCA antigens included proteinase 3 (PR3), myeloperoxidase (MPO), bactericidal/permeability increasing protein (BPI), human leukocyte elastase (HLE), cathepsin G (CG) and lactoferrin (LF). The prevalence of ANCA in patients with (n=65) and without (n=30) active renal pathological lesions were also compared to find whether ANCA were correlated with renal disease activities. Results (1) None of the sera recognized PR3 or MPO, only one serum recognized BPI. A striking finding was that 59/95 (62.1%) of the sera recognized CG and the titers of some sera could reach 1/3 200, 8/95 (8.4%) recognized LF. (2) By with IIF method, only 22% was ANCA positive. (3) the percentage of anti-CG positive samples in patients with active renal pathological lesions was significantly higher than that in patients without active lesions (73.8% vs 36.7%, P <0.0001), whereas, anti-LF antibodies had no correlation with active renal lesions. Conclusion Majority of the LN patients had ANCA and their target antigens was CG, and anti CG antibodies might be correlated with renal pathological activities. It is not reliable to detect ANCA with IIF method for ANA positive sera.
出处
《中华内科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
1998年第12期829-832,共4页
Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine