摘要
目的对针刺治疗失眠的常用有效处方镇静安神针法与针刺跷脉法(阴阳跷脉循行路线上的申脉穴与照海穴)进行临床疗效的对比评价。方法选取符合诊断标准的失眠患者40例,随机分成各20人的两组,分别以镇静安神针法和针刺跷脉法进行治疗。结果镇静安神针法组的总有效率达到90%,针刺跷脉法组达到75%,二者之间存在显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论镇静安神针法与针刺跷脉法治疗失眠皆有较好疗效,镇静安神针法疗效更佳。
Objective To compare the curative effects of insomnia between mind-tranquilizing acupuncture and heel vessel acupuncture.Methods Forty patients were randomly divided into two groups with 20 cases in each group.One group received mind-tranquilizing acupuncture and the other received heel vessel acupuncture.Results The response rate was 90% in the mind-tranquilizing acupuncture group and 75% in the other group.There had significant difference（P〈0.05） between the two groups.Conclusion Mind-tranquilizing acupuncture and heel vessel acupuncture are of certain value in clinical treatment of insomnia,and mind-tranquilizing acupuncture has a better effect on it.
出处
《时珍国医国药》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第3期686-687,共2页
Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research
基金
吉林省教育厅项目资助(No.2006-227)
关键词
针刺
失眠
疗效比较
Acupuncture therapy
Insomnia
Comparison of the curative effects
