摘要
纪昀在《阅微草堂笔记》中,对蒲松龄和《聊斋志异》作了严厉的批判,既指责作品内容驳杂和不真实,又影射蒲松龄用《聊斋志异》来发泄对现实的不满,造成了很不良的社会效果。纪昀创作《阅微草堂笔记》就是为了挽回《聊斋志异》的不利影响。尽管纪昀的创作态度和作品的社会影响与蒲松龄及《聊斋志异》截然不同,但《阅微草堂笔记》同样内容驳杂和不真实。
Ji Yun has made the severe critique to Pu Songling and "Strange Stories from a Chi- nese Studio" in "Story of Yuewei Caotang", both the accusation work heterogeneous in content and is not real, and insinuated that Pu Songling gives vent with "Strange Stories from a Chinese Studio" to the reality disaffection, has created the very bad social effect. Ji Yun creates "Story of Yuewei Caorang" is for recalls "Strange Stories from a Chinese Studio" the adverse effect. Although Ji Yun's creation manner and work social impact with Pu Songling and "Strange Stories from a Chinese Studi- o" entirely different, but "Story of Yuewei Caotang" the similar heterogeneous in content and is not real.
出处
《楚雄师范学院学报》
2010年第2期1-5,10,共6页
Journal of Chuxiong Normal University
关键词
纪昀
蒲松龄
指责
影射
Ji Yun
Pu Songling
accusation
counterfeit