期刊文献+

EFL课堂讨论的有效性研究 被引量:2

The Study on the Validity of Discussion in EFL Class
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有效的EFL课堂讨论包含任务适切性、能力培养多元性、学生参与自主性、过程体现合作性、蕴含教育性等基本特征。教师应该从明确讨论的目的、优化讨论的话题、合理设计讨论的形式、选择讨论的最佳时机、营造良好的课堂讨论氛围、加强组织调控、及时并恰当地反馈评价等方面对课堂讨论进行优化设计。课堂讨论实施过程中还要体现学生为主体、激励性、知识与能力并重等原则。 Valid discussion in EFL class should include the pertinence of tasks, the diversity of improving abilities, the independence for students to participate in, the collaboration in the process and the contained education and so on. Teachers should optimize and design the class discussion according to the aspects such as the aim and the topic of discussion, the form of discussion in reason, the best opportunity for discussion, good atmosphere for discussion, the organizational control and feedback of evaluation etc. Besides, the principle of giving priority to students, paying equal attention to knowledge and ability should be materialized in the process of class discussion.
作者 丁薇
出处 《青海民族大学学报(教育科学版)》 2010年第2期108-111,共4页 Journal of Qinghai Junior Teachers' College
关键词 EFL课堂 讨论 有效性 EFL class discussion validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Brown, H. D. 1994Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy[M].Upper Saddle River, New Jersey : Prentice Hall Regents : 189.
  • 2Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications [ M]. New York: Longman.
  • 3Krashen, S. 1959. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis [ J]. Modern Language Journal 4:440 - 464.
  • 4Swain, M. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning [A]. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.). Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics [ C]. Oxford, England: OUP.
  • 5Swain, M. 1998. Focus on form through conscious reflection [ A]. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds.). Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition [ C]. NY: CUP.
  • 6Swain, M. 1995. Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning [J]. Applied Linguistics 16 : 371 - 391.
  • 7River, M. W. Interactive Language Teaching[ M]. Cambridge University Press: 1997. 264.
  • 8教育部高等教育司.大学英语课程教学标准[Z].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2007.
  • 9欧阳芬,黄小华.新课程下课堂教学技能的创新与发展[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2004.
  • 10单力真.分组讨论在教学中出现的问题及解决办法[J].胜利油田职工大学学报,2003(4):18-19. 被引量:4

二级参考文献1

  • 1教育部.普通高中英语课程标准(实验)【M】.北京:人民教育出版社.2002.

共引文献124

同被引文献17

  • 1方旭.课堂讨论要有实效[J].当代教育科学,2006(6):58-58. 被引量:14
  • 2Brown, H. D. 1994. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy [ M]. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey : Prentice Hall Regents : 189.
  • 3Chen, G. & Tjosvold, D. 2002. Cooperative Goals and Constructive Controversy for Promoting Innovation in Student Groups in China. Journal of Education for Business, 7S (1) , 46.
  • 4Chen, G. , Lui, C. , & Tjosvold, D. 2005. Conflict Management for Effective Top Management Teams and Innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (2). 277 -300.
  • 5David W. Johnson and Roger T. Johnson, 1988. Critical Thinking Through Structured Controversy. Educational Leadership, 58 - 64.
  • 6David W. Johnson and Roger T. Johnson, 2000. Civil Political Discourse In A Democracy: The Contribution Of Psychology. Peace & Conflict. Journal of Peace Psychology, 6(4), 291 -317.
  • 7Deutsch, M. 1973. The Resolution of Cotrflict. New Haven/Conn. : Yale University Press.
  • 8Piaget, J. 1950. The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • 9Schmidt, R. 1990. The Role of Consciousness in Second Language learning[ J]. Applied Linguistics, 11 (2) :129 -158.
  • 10Smith, Karl A. 1984. Structured Controversy. Engineering Education, 74 (5), 306 - 309.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部