期刊文献+

语义变化不在场主体的遮蔽——空间意象图式隐喻 被引量:1

The Hidden Main Body of Semantic Change:Metaphorization of Spatial Image Schema
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对空间的感知能力是人类基本的认知能力,人类的认知存在普遍的空间认知模式。意象图式是引起语义变化的被遮蔽的主体,意象图式隐喻是以空间概念为源域来构建其他非空间性的目标域的,实现不同领域的跨越路径是空间映射。 One of the basic human cognitive abilities is that of space perception, and man shares a awareness of spatial cognition model. Metaphorization of image schema implies the construction of non - general spatial target concepts by the use of original spatial ones, image schema is hence the hidden trigger of changes of meaning.
作者 白臻贤
出处 《武陵学刊》 2010年第1期141-144,共4页 Journal of Wuling
基金 湖南省教育厅科研项目"意象图式模式与语义的扩展及扩展牵制研究"(06C464)
关键词 意象图式 隐喻 意义 空间映射 image schema metaphor meaning space mapping
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Alverson H.Semantics and Experience:Universal metaphors of time in English,Mandarin,Hindi,and Sesotho[M].Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press,1994.
  • 2吴念阳,徐凝婷,张琰.空间图式加工促进方向性时间表述的理解[J].心理科学,2007,30(4):853-856. 被引量:27
  • 3Lakoff,G.,M.Turner.More than Cool Reason-a Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor.[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1989:63.
  • 4Langacker,R.W.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar,Theoretical Prerequisites[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press,1987:118.
  • 5Levinson,Stephen C.Space in language and cognition[M].Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,2003.
  • 6Kovecses,Z.Metaphors of Anger,Pride,and Love:A Lexical Approach to the Structure of Concepts[M].Amsterdam/Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company,1990:40.
  • 7束定芳.隐喻学研究[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2001.22,82.
  • 8Fauconnier,G.Mappings in Thought and Language[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997:8-10.
  • 9朱永生,蒋勇.空间映射论与常规含意的推导[J].外语教学与研究,2003,35(1):26-33. 被引量:80

二级参考文献34

  • 1周榕.隐喻认知基础的心理现实性——时间的空间隐喻表征的实验证据[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(2):88-93. 被引量:118
  • 2Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Originally published in 1985. Cambridge: MIT Press.]
  • 3Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge UNversity
  • 4Fauconnier, G. 1999. Methods and generalizations [A].In T. Janssen & G. Redeker (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology [C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 5Fauconnier, G. & E. Sweetser (eds.). 1996. Spaces,Worlds, and Grammar [C]. Chicago & London:The University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1994. Conceptual projection and middle spaces [R]. UCSD Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401.
  • 7Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1996. Blending as a central process of grammar [ A ]. In A. Goldberg (ed.). Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language [C]. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  • 8Fillmore, C. J., P. Kay & C. O'Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions:The case of let alone [J]. Language 64: 501-538.
  • 9Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 1999. Speaking and thinking with metonymy [A]. In Klaus-Uwe Panther & G. Radden (eds.). 1999.
  • 10Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [M].Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

共引文献210

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部