期刊文献+

跨期选择中的反常现象及其心理机制 被引量:7

Psychological Mechanisms for Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 时间折现是跨期选择研究的核心问题。指数折现效用模型(DU模型)是描述时间折现现象的基本模型。跨期选择的实验研究中发现的大量违背DU模型的反常现象表明,DU模型并不能很好地解释人们在跨期选择中的真实行为。文章从时间知觉、建构水平、参照点和价值函数、情绪激活、情绪麻木、期待效用等角度探讨了造成各种反常现象的心理机制,并提出了值得进一步研究的方向和问题。 The Discounted Utility Model (DU model)has been considered fundamental to account for time discounting which is the focus of intertemporal choice research. However, anomalies found in previous studies indicate that the DU model is not adequate enough to explain the real decision behavior in intertemporal situations. The possible psychological mechanisms underlying these anomalies are discussed respectivelyfrom the perspective of time perception, construal level, reference point and value function, emotion activation, emotion anaesthesia and utility of expectation. Based on the review and discussion of current research findings, some new directions and issues are proposed for future research.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2009年第4期298-305,共8页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 浙江省自然科学基金(Y206488) 国家基础科学人才培养基金(J0630760)
关键词 跨期选择 反常现象 时间折现 intertemporal choice, anomalies, time discounting
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1黄希庭,郑涌.时间透视的自我整合:I.心理结构方式的投射测验[J].心理学报,2000,32(1):30-35. 被引量:51
  • 2林晓梅.(2007).跨时间序列偏好研究.硕士论文.浙江大学.
  • 3张锋,水仁德,周艳艳,梁君英,沈模卫.海洛因延迟强化物超快速折扣倾向的心理机制[J].心理学报,2009,41(8):763-772. 被引量:9
  • 4张锋,周艳艳,李鹏,沈模卫.海洛因戒除者的行为冲动性:基于DDT和IGT任务反应模式的探讨[J].心理学报,2008,40(6):642-653. 被引量:19
  • 5Chapman, G. B. ( 1996 ). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition ,22,771 - 791.
  • 6Elster, J. , & Loewenstein, G. ( 1992 ). Utility from memory and anticipation. In J. Elster, & G. Loewenstein( Eds. ) , Choice over time( pp. 213 - 234). New York : Russell Sage.
  • 7Frederick, S. , Loewenstein, G. , & O' Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference : A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature,40,351 - 401.
  • 8Green, L. , & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabi- listic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130,769 - 792.
  • 9Hardisty, D. J. , & Weber, E. U. ( 2009 ). Discounting future green:Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General ,138,329 - 340.
  • 10Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica ,47,263 - 292.

二级参考文献111

  • 1黄希庭,郑涌.时间记忆的理论与实验范型[J].心理科学,1995,18(4):201-205. 被引量:18
  • 2Baker, F., Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2003). Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 382-392.
  • 3Bechara, A. (2005). Decision making, impulse control, and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1458-1463.
  • 4Bechara, A. (2003). Risky Business: Emotion, Decision-Making, and Addiction. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 23-51.
  • 5Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52,336-372.
  • 6Bickel, W. K., & Marsch, A. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction, 9, 73-86.
  • 7Bickel, W. K., Miller, M. L., Yi, R., Kowal, B. P., Lindquist, D.M., & Pitcock, J. A. (2007). Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: Competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90S, S85-S91.
  • 8Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., & Madden, G. J. (1999). Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 146, 447--454.
  • 9Bolla, K. I., Eldreth-, D. A., London, E. D., Kiehl, K. A., Mouratidis, M., Contoreggi, C., et al. (2003). Orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in abstinent cocaine abusers performing a decision-making task. Neurolmage, 19, 1085-1094.
  • 10Bordnick, P. S., Graap, K. M., Copp, H., Brooks, J., Ferrer, M., & Logue, B. (2004). Utilizing virtual reality to standardize nicotine craving research: A pilot study. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 1889-1894.

共引文献74

同被引文献123

引证文献7

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部