期刊文献+

基于YAH(You-Are-Here)地图定向中的方位效应

The Direction Effect in Orientation Based on YAH(You-Are-Here) Map
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究基于YAH地图进行方位判断时是否存在方位效应及其表现形式。方法:90名被试分为三组参加三个被试内设计实验,实验一为基于YAH地图的绝对朝向判断,实验二为基于YAH地图的相对方位判断,实验三为不同绝对朝向条件下(失匹配)的相对方位判断。结果:绝对朝向判断中存在绝对朝向效应及北优势效应,反应时上表现为"0°<(90°/180°/270°)<(45°/135°/225°/315°)";相对方位判断中存在相对方位效应,表现为反应时"(0°/90°/180°/270°)<(45°/135°/225°/315°)";失匹配条件下相对方位效应表现为"0°<(90°/180°/270°)<(45°//315°)<(135°/225°)",相对方位效应模式不受绝对朝向影响。结论:基于YAH地图定向存在绝对朝向效应及相对方位效应,相对方位效应不受绝对朝向的影响。 The present study mainly investigated the direction effect in orientation based on YAH (You Are Here) map. 90 subjects were assigned to three within-subject experiments. Absolute heading direction judgment, relative location judgment and relative location judgment in different heading directions (misalignment)were executed respectively. The results indicated that the absolute heading direction effect and north advantage were significant in Expl, mainly represented as"0° 〈 (90°/180°/270°) 〈 (45°/135°/ 225°/315°) ". The relative location effect was significant but no significant front advantage effect wasfound in Exp2, mainly represented as "( 0°/90°/ 180°/270°) 〈 (45°/135°/225°/315°) ". The relative location effect and front advantage were significant in Exp3, mainly represented as "0°〈 (90°/ 180°/270°) 〈 (45°//315°) 〈 ( 135°/225°) ", and such representation was independent of absolute heading direction. Thus, the direction effect in orientation based on YAH(You-Are-Here) map was mainly represented as absolute heading direction effect and relative location effect, and the latter was independent of absolute heading direction.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2009年第4期361-367,共7页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 杭州市哲学社会科学规划课题(B09SH07) 浙江理工大学校留学人员及引进科研启动基金(0613268-Y)
关键词 YAH地图 定向 方位效应 YAH map orientation direction effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1C.D.威肯斯,J.G.霍兰兹.(2003).工程心理学与久的作业(朱祖祥,葛列众,张智君,等译).上海:华东师范大学出版社.
  • 2陈毓芬.(2000).地图空间认知理论的研究.博士学位论文.郑州:中国人民解放军信息工程大学.
  • 3周荣刚,张侃.自我参照和环境参照整合过程中的主方位判断[J].心理学报,2005,37(3):298-307. 被引量:6
  • 4周荣刚,张侃.多参照系条件下信息获取方式对绝对方位判断的影响[J].心理学报,2008,40(11):1137-1148. 被引量:13
  • 5周荣刚,张侃.参照系整合条件下的空间方位判断[J].航天医学与医学工程,2008,21(5):386-391. 被引量:1
  • 6Brown, B. (2007). Working the problems of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 34, 364 - 383.
  • 7FrankIin, N. , & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General ,119,63 - 76.
  • 8Gugerty, L. , & Brooks, J. (2001). Seeing whereyou are heading: Integrating environmental and egocentric reference frames in cardinal direction judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7,251 - 266.
  • 9Guserty, L. , & Brooks, J. (2004). Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments : Group differences and strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology :Applied ,10,75 - 88.
  • 10Gugerty, L. , & Rodes, W. ( 2007 ) A cognitive model of strategies for cardinal direction judgments. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 7, 179 -212.

二级参考文献42

  • 1杨家忠,周荣刚,张侃.空间主方位判断的训练和方位效应[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1322-1325. 被引量:3
  • 2周荣刚,张侃.自我参照和环境参照整合过程中的主方位判断[J].心理学报,2005,37(3):298-307. 被引量:6
  • 3周荣刚,张侃.基于参照系整合的想象空间方位转化判断[J].人类工效学,2005,11(2):7-9. 被引量:3
  • 4Gugerty L, Brooks J. Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: Group differences and strategies. Journal of experimental psychology: Applied, 2004, 10(2): 75 -68
  • 5Aretz A J. The desiga of electronic map displays. Human Factors, 1991,33(1): 85 - 101
  • 6Klatzky R. Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnection. In Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K. (Eds.), Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (1 -17). New York: Springer, 1998
  • 7Avraamides M, Loomis J, Klatzky R L, Golledge R G. Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: Evidence from allocentric judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning Memory & Cognition, 2004, 30:801 -814
  • 8Wickens C D, Hollands J G. Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd). 2000, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
  • 9Gugerty L, deBoom D, Jenkins J C. Keeping north in mind: How navigators reason about cardinal directions. Proceeding of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, 2000, 1:148 - 151
  • 10Zhou R, Yang J, Zhang K. Training-related difference in cardinal direction judgments based on integrating reference frames. 2003, Proceedings of IEA2003, Seoul, Korea

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部