期刊文献+

S-L问卷短期复测的稳定性研究 被引量:4

On reliability of S L questionnaire in short term test retest
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了解SL问卷所得数据的重复稳定性及问卷结构对稳定性的影响,对74名男子用SL问卷作初测,一周后复测。分析前后二次问卷配对数据的相关性和差异显著性。所有项目的复测分值均值都高于初测均值。年龄和文化程度对IPSS总分和生活质量分在二次调查间的差异无影响。问卷自身不稳定引起前后调查数据不尽一致。SL问卷未给连续渐变型症状及部分突变型症状以明确的参照点。 To evaluate in depth the reliability of data obtained from the S L questionnaire in clinical investigation and to evaluate the effects of the structure of I PSS questionnaire on its reliability,S L questionnaire was administered to 74 men in a retrospective investigation and the same men in a sub prospective investigation in one week. The correlation and differences between the paired data were analyzed for their statistical significance.The results of the study showed that the mean scores of all items increased from Time 1 to Time 2. Differences in age and educational level had no effects on the differences in total score (I PSS) and life quality score between the two investigations.The instability of the questionnaire itself yields differences between two sets of data obtained from the same subject at two times with a short period apart. As the questionnaire did not specify a reference point for the symptom, the coincidence of scores between the first test and re test was greatly reduced.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1998年第12期728-732,共5页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 前列腺增生 症状 前列腺症状评分 稳定性 Prostatic hypertrophy Symptom I PSS
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1顾方六,中华泌尿外科杂志,1994年,15卷,230页

同被引文献24

  • 1蒋志伟,尚磊,徐勇勇,陈长生.应征男青年体质状况评价的方法[J].第四军医大学学报,2004,25(11):1050-1052. 被引量:3
  • 2国际协调委员会有关前列腺疾病患者诊断和治疗方法的推荐意见[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1994,15(3):230-235. 被引量:74
  • 3安瑞华,冯陶,郭应禄,沈绍基.香豆素对实验性大鼠草酸钙结石形成的影响[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1994,15(3):209-212. 被引量:35
  • 4Denis L, Griffiths K, Khoury S, et al. Proceeding of the 2nd International Consultation on BPH. Plymouth, United Kingdora, Health Publication, 1998.
  • 5Barry M J, Fowler FJ, O'Leary MP, et al. The American urological association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol, 1992, 148:1549-57.
  • 6McConnell JD. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: treatment guidelines and patient classification. Br J Urol, 1995, 76: 29-46.
  • 7Barry M J, Williford WO, Chang Y, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia specific status measures in clinical research: how much change in the American Urological Association symptom index and the benign prostatic hyperplasia impact index is perceptible to patients. J Urol, 1995, 154: 1770-4.
  • 8吉村亚希子 新美三由纪 大桥靖雄 等.International prostate symptom score[J].日泌尿会志,1997,88:1013-20.
  • 9Lujan M, Paez BA, Martin OE, et al. The validity of the IPSS questionnaire in a sample of 262 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Arch Esp Uro, 1997, 50(8): 847-53.
  • 10Rodrigues Netto N Jr, de Lima ML, de Andrade EF, et al. Latin American study on patient acceptance of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in the evaluation of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology, 1997, 49 (1): 46-9.

引证文献4

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部