期刊文献+

亨普尔的归纳悖论 被引量:2

On Hempel's Inductive Paradox
下载PDF
导出
摘要 亨普尔验证悖论,又叫乌鸦悖论,是同时运用逻辑演算和尼柯德标准产生的。它涉及逻辑等值、实质蕴含、尼柯德标准等多种因素。此前消除悖论的方式是否定其中一个因素。实际上,亨普尔悖论是逻辑规则与尼柯德标准之间的表面不一致。尼柯德标准并不是一个逻辑标准,而是科学家在检验经验假说时采用的实践原则。因此,我们应该将假说验证的逻辑规则与科学假说的实践验证区分开来。这样,实质蕴含、逻辑等值、尼柯德标准在假说检验的逻辑中都可以保留,而在逻辑上并没有悖论。 Hempel' s Paradox of Confirmation or Raven Paradox is a result of conjunction of logical calculus and Nicod' s criterion; it involves logical equivalence, material implication, Nicod' s criterion and other concepts. However, it is indeed an effect of the surface conflict between the logical rules and Nicod' s criteri- on of confirmation. However, Nicod criterion is not logical, but a practical procedure or guidance used in testing hypothesis. Therefore we should make distinction between the logic of hypothesis testing and the procedures of the practical testing. The paradox is thus revolved without rejection of any elements of formal logic or Nicod' s criterion.
作者 朱志方
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期35-39,共5页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 亨普尔 验证悖论 乌鸦悖论 尼柯德标准 C. Hemple paradox of confirmation Raven paradox Nicod' s criterion
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Camap, R. (1962) , Logical foundations of Probability, The University of Chicago Press.
  • 2Cohen, Yael ( 1987 ) , " Ravens and relevance ", Erkenntnis 26.
  • 3FarreU, Robert J. ( 1979 ), Material implication, confirmation, and counterfactuals, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic, Volume 20, Number 2.
  • 4Fitelson, B and Hawthorne, J (2006), How Bayesian Confirmation Theory Handles the Paradox of the Ravens, in Probability in Science, Chicago: Open Court.
  • 5Good, I.J. (1960) The Paradox of Confirmation, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 11, No. 42.
  • 6Maher, P (1999) Inductive Logic and the Ravens Paradox, Philosophy of Science, 66.
  • 7Quine, W.V. ( 1969 ) Natural Kinds, in Ontological Relativity and other Essays. New York Columbia university Press.
  • 8Schefller I, Goodman N.J. (1972) , Selective Confirmation and the Ravens, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 69, No. 3.
  • 9Hempel, Carl( 1965 ), Studies in the Logic of Confirmation, first appeared in Mind, 1945 (54), reprinted in Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other essays in the Philosophy of Science, Free Press, 1965.

同被引文献31

  • 1顿新国.确证悖论的贝叶斯型解决方案探析[J].科学技术与辩证法,2007,24(1):37-39. 被引量:3
  • 2陈嘉明.知识与确证[M].上海;上海人民出版社,2003.
  • 3Wason, P. C. Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology[C].Harmondsworth:Penguin. 1966:145-146.
  • 4Oaksford,M.,& Chater, N.A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection [J]. Psychological Review, 1994 (101): 608-631.
  • 5Wason, P C.& Shapiro,D. Natural and Contrived Experience in a Reasoning Pronlems[J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,g 1071 (23): 63-71.
  • 6Griggs,R A.& Cox, J R.The Elusive Thematicmaterials Effect in Wason's Selection Task [J]. British Journal of Psychology, 1982(73): 407-420.
  • 7Margolis H. Wason's selection task with a reduced array[J]. Psycoloquy, 2000.
  • 8John R. Anderson.Cognitive Psychology and Its Implication (7th ed. )[M].Worth Publishers,2010:279.
  • 9M.A Just, P. A.Carpenter, T. A.Keller, et al.Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension[J],Science.1996 (274): 114-116.
  • 10Giv6n, T. Functionalism and Grammar [M]. Amsterdam / Philadel- phia: John Benjamins Publishing Company,1995:28.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部