期刊文献+

家庭背景、体制转型与中国农村精英的代际传承(1978-1996) 被引量:63

Family Origins,Institutional Transformations and Elite Reproduction in Rural China,1978-1996
原文传递
导出
摘要 使用一个1996年收集的全国抽样数据,并结合事件史分析方法(离散时间风险模型),本文探讨了1978年中国农村经济体制改革后,到底是哪些农民能够抓住机会实现经济上的成功并成为农村中的精英阶层。本研究具体检验了中国农村居民的精英职业地位获得是如何受到他们改革前或解放前的家庭背景影响的。数据分析结果表明:第一,"旧式精英"(解放前的政治或经济精英)和"新式精英"(解放后再分配经济时期的政治或经济精英)家庭背景的农民,改革后进入非农职业的机率都比较高。第二,在不同历史阶段,精英职业获得模式是不同的。低风险性是导致改革早期新、旧精英的后代的选择趋同的主要原因,反映了他们在对社会经济发展走向无法清晰把握时的一种选择理性,而改革后期他们非农化道路的分野则充分体现了个体的社会行动是如何受其家庭背景(或精英文化因素)影响的。基于这些发现,作者提出"精英文化的代际传承"观点,指出除了当前学界讨论较多的权力和人力资本因素之外,文化因素也是转型期中国农村社会分层的重要作用机制。 Using data from a nationally representative survey conducted in 1996,this paper explores determinants of occupational attainments in rural China since the late 1970s. Specifically,the paper examines how status attainment is affected by different types of family origins. The results show that people with old-elite family origin (political or economic elite families in rural China during the pre-liberated era) or newelite family origin (political or economic elite families in rural China during the redistributive period between 1949 and 1978) had been more likely to enter elite occupations after the economic reform. Moreover,although both old and new elite families had advantages,they differed in strategies. People in new-elite families tended to enter wage labor or rural cadre occupations during the whole period covered (1978 -1996). For those in old-elite families,their choices varied with time:during the earlier stage of reform (1978-1986),they chose to enter wage labor occupations; while during the later stage (1987-1996),they chose to enter rural entrepreneur or self-employed occupations. To explain this,the paper adopts the cultural reproduction theory proposed by Bourdieu,arguing that elite culture transmitted across generations facilitates economic success during the market transition in rural China.
作者 吴愈晓
出处 《社会学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期125-150,共26页 Sociological Studies
基金 山东大学"985"工程第二期引进人才科研启动经费的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

二级参考文献146

  • 1林毅夫,蔡昉,李周.论中国经济改革的渐进式道路[J].经济研究,1993,28(9):3-11. 被引量:191
  • 2谢桂华.市场转型与下岗工人[J].社会学研究,2006(1):22-58. 被引量:21
  • 3Adamchik, Vera A. & Arjun S. Bedi 2000, Wage Differentials between the Public and the Private Sectors: Evidence from an Economy in Transition. Labor Economics 7.
  • 4Becker, Sascha O. & Andrea Ichino 2002, "Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores. " The Stata Journal Vol.2, No.4.
  • 5Bian, Yanjie & John Logan 1996, Market Transition and Persistence of Power: The Changing Stratification System in Urban China. American Sociological Review 61.
  • 6Blalock, Hubert M. 1991, Understanding Social Inequality'. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • 7Blau, Peter M. 1977, Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • 8Brand, Jennie E. & Charles Halaby 2005, "Regression and Matching Estimates of the Effects of Elite College Attendance on Educational and Career Achievement." SocialScience Research 35.
  • 9Brand, Jennie & Xie Yu 2006, " Composite Causal Effects for Time-Varying Treatments and Time-Varying Outcomes. " University of Michigan Population Studies Center Research Report No. 06 - 601.
  • 10Cai, Yongshun 2002, "The Resistance of Chinese Laid-off Workers in the Reform Period." The China Quarterly 170.

共引文献233

引证文献63

二级引证文献680

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部