经济犯罪侦查启动程序研究

A Study on the Initiative Procedure in Investigative Practice of Economic Crime

我国侦查程序的启动模式沿袭了前苏联的启动模式,与西方国家有着很大的差异,主要体现在把立案程序作为与侦查并列的一个单独阶段。这种模式在我国过去的普通刑事犯罪侦查实践中,发挥了分流案件、保障人权、制约侦查权的扩张等诸多功能。但是近十年的经侦实践表明,这种侦查程序的启动模式,在应对经济犯罪时表现出诸多不相适应之处,抑制了侦查的效率、增加了犯罪黑数、削弱了对经济犯罪被害人诉权的保障。为了应对严峻的经济犯罪形势,应当遵循认识论的规律,增加立案审查阶段的调查手段,降低立案追诉实体要件的证明标准,并深入研究和梳理出涉及经济犯罪侦查的行政认定和鉴定,制定统一的操作规程。

Taken from Unit Soviet, the initiative model in investigative practice of economic crime in China is different from western countries. Its key feature is to take the procedure of placing a case on file as a dependent part similar to investigative practice. This pattern has made big function in common criminal investigative procedure before. However, there are some defects in the preliminary investigative procedure in China after the development in about ten years, while facing economic crimes. So, this paper thinks that cognitive laws should be hold in the initiative procedure in investigative practice of economic crime, perfect the inspect ways of placing a case on file, and that common legal regulation should be taken on it.