期刊文献+

诉诸人身与诉诸人身谬误

下载PDF
导出
摘要 诉诸人身谬误是一种非常悠久也极为常见的谬误形式,它在实际论证中存在许多变体。究其实质,诉诸人身谬误是一种不相干谬误,是以攻击对方的人格、处境或与自身相矛盾的言行代替对观点的反驳。但是在实际论证中,并非所有的诉诸人身攻击都是逻辑谬误,随着具体语用条件的变化,其中有些人身攻击的论述是合理的,需要我们将其与人身攻击谬误区别开来。
作者 王启
出处 《开封教育学院学报》 2010年第1期24-25,共2页 Journal of Kaifeng Institute of Education
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献16

  • 1I. M.Copi,C.Cohen. Introduction to Logic. New York:Macmillan Publishing Company. 1994. ;P.J.Hurley. A Concise Introduction to Logic. Belmont :Wadsworth Publishing Company. 1997.
  • 2Dauglas Walton. AdHominem Arguments. Tuscaloosa:The University of Alabama Press. 1998.
  • 3I.M.Copi,C.Cohen. Introduction to Logic. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. 1994. nineth edition, tenth edition.
  • 4P. J. Hurley. A Concise Introduction to Logic. Belmont :Wadsworth Publishing Company. 1997.
  • 5Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. University of Toronto Press. 1998.
  • 6Frans H.Van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst , "The Pragma - Dialectical Approach to ,Fallacies ". in Fallacies : Classical and contemporary readings. Hans V. Hanson and Robert C. Pinto. eds., University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.1995.
  • 7Douglas Walton, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy (Studies in Rhetoric and Communication), University of AiabamaPress, 1995.
  • 8Dauglas Walton. One - sided Arguments :A Dialectical Analysis of Bias .New York:State University of New York Press.1999.
  • 9Dauglas Walton. Ad Hominem Argumenu. Tuscaloosa : The University of Alabama Press. 1998. xi - xvii.
  • 10Alan Brian , ' The Ad Hominem'. in Fallacies: Classical and contemporary readings. Hans V. Hanson and Robert C. Pinto. eds., University Park:Pennsylvania State University Press. 1995.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部