期刊文献+

肾盂切开联合气压弹道碎石治疗复杂性鹿角形肾结石 被引量:4

Pneumatic lithotripsy for huge staghorn renal stones through pyelostomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨肾盂切开联合气压弹道碎石技术治疗复杂性鹿角形肾结石的疗效。方法对43例复杂性鹿角形肾结石患者行肾盂切开联合气压弹道碎石术的临床资料进行分析总结。结果43例行肾盂切开联合气压弹道碎石取石均成功,5例因完全肾内型肾盂致使无法显露肾窦内肾盂或术中碎石角度困难而改行肾实质小切口联合气压弹道碎石取石。术中不阻断肾蒂血流,无大出血,无肾盂黏膜撕裂,全组无输血,平均手术时间为136min。40例随访8个月-3年,平均21个月,有1例结石复发,经体外震波碎石(ESWL)后排净。结论该术式将泌尿外科腔镜气压弹道碎石技术运用到开放手术中,使术式操作简单、安全、出血少、对肾脏损害轻微,是治疗复杂性鹿角形肾结石比较理想的手术方法。 Objective To investigate the operative treatment of pneumatic lithotripsy for huge staghorn rehal stones through pyelostomy. Methods The clinical data of 43 cases who were treated by pneumatic lithotripsy for huge staghorn renal stones through pyelostomy. Results 43 patients were successfully removed stones by pneumatic lithotripsy for huge staghorn renal stones through pyelostomy. 5 patients were removed stones by renal parenchyma discission with mini - incision in combination with pneumatic lithotripsy because of complex condition. During the operation, the renal blood flow was not blocked, and all the patient did not have massive haemorrhage, laceration of pelvis mueosa and blood transfusion. The average operation time was 136 minutes. 40 patients had been followed up from 8 months to 3 years, averaged 21 months. Only one patient was found to recur, but was healed by ESWL. Conclusion Pneumatic lithotripsy for huge staghorn renal stones through pyelostomy is simple, safe, less blooding and less damage for kidney, and it is a ideal operation for huge staghom renal stones.
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2010年第7期21-22,共2页 Hainan Medical Journal
关键词 肾盂 鹿角形结石 气压弹道碎石术 Kidney Kidney calculi Huge staghom renal stones Pneumatic lithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献27

  • 1陈仕平,许恩赐,叶传忠.肾窦内肾盂加肾后下部联合切开治疗巨大鹿角形肾结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1995,16(10):594-596. 被引量:71
  • 2梅骅.泌尿外科手术(第2版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.60-64.
  • 3赵元君.肾门后唇切开摘除巨大鹿角形结石[J].中华外科杂志,1986,24(4):198-198.
  • 4Olbert P,Weber J,Hegele A,et al.Combining lithoclast and ultrasound power in one device for percutaneous nephrolithotomy:in vitro results of a novel and highly effective technology.Urology,2003,61:55-59.
  • 5Auge B K,Lallas C D,Pietrow P K,et al.In vitro comparison of standard ultrasound and pneumatic lithotrites with a new combination intracorporeal lithotripsy device.Urology,2002,60:28-32.
  • 6Hofmann R,Olbert P,Weber J,et al.Clinical experience with a new ultrasonic and LithoClast combination for percutaneous litholapaxy.BJU Int,2002,90:16-19.
  • 7Pietrow P K,Auge B K,Zhong P,et al.Clinical efficacy of a combination pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotrite.J Urol,2003,169:1247-1249.
  • 8Kuo R L,Siqueira T M,Mcateer J A,et al.The new swiss lithoclast master:in-vitro assessment of setting efficiencies.J Urol,2002 (167 Suppl):367 (abstract 1460).
  • 9黄志强 黎鳌 等.外科手术学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.1161.
  • 10苏泽轩 金庆骝 等.肾窦内肾盂加肾后部段间区切开治疗巨大鹿角形肾结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1989,10:323-325.

共引文献507

同被引文献15

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部