期刊文献+

骨骼肌包埋神经片段桥接与神经移植修复神经缺损的比较 被引量:6

Comparison of degenerated muscle graft combined with nervous fragment with nerve grafting in the treatment of peripheral nerve defects.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:报导1993年1月~1997年10月应用自体神经移植及骨骼肌包埋自体神经片段桥接修复48例60条神经缺损,并比较两者的疗效;方法:其中30例38条神经行神经移植,18例22条神经行骨骼肌包埋自体神经片段桥接;结果:术后随访8mo~24mo,按MCRR标准对肢体神经运动感觉功能评定疗效;优良率神经移植组2cm~5cm,占83.8%,6cm~10cm,占76.9%,11cm~20cm,占57.1%,骨骼肌包埋自体神经片段桥接组2cm~5cm,占80%,6cm~10cm占62.5%,11cm~20cm,占50%;结论:两者疗效在短距离或长距离缺损时差异不明显,而中等距离缺损时疗效有差异。 object: Reported using degenerated muscle grafts combined with nervous fragment or auto-nerve grafting in the treatment of peripheral nerve defects and comparing the results of the two methods, Methods: 38 branches of nerve defects in 30 cases were treated with auto-nerve grafting. while others 22 branches in 18 cases with degenerated muscle grafts combined with nerve fragment. Result: After 8 to 24 mouths post ?operative follow - up according to the MCRR Criterion, evaluated the results between the two methods. in movement and sense. excellent and good rates: auto-nerve grafting group: in length of (2 cm^5 cm) 83.8 % ; (6 cm~ 10 cm) 76.9 %; (11 cm^20 cm) 57.1 % degenented muscle graft combined with nerve fragment group, in length of (2 cm^5 cm) 80 %; (6 cm^10 cm) 62.5 %; (11 cm^20 cm) 50 %. Conclusion: In shorter or longer distance nerve defects, the two methods showed no difference, but in middle distance nerve defects showed obvious difference.
出处 《中国临床医学杂志》 1998年第4期207-208,共2页
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献7

  • 1傅小宽,中华显微外科杂志,1993年,16卷,197页
  • 2万智勇,浙江医学,1992年,14卷,28页
  • 3席保平,中华显微外科杂志,1990年,13卷,43页
  • 4张爱华,中华显微外科杂志,1990年,13卷,25页
  • 5忻元培,中华显微外科杂志,1988年,11卷,95页
  • 6朱盛修,中华显微外科杂志,1988年,11卷,65页
  • 7孔吉明,中华显微外科杂志,1986年,9卷,68页

共引文献7

同被引文献38

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

;
使用帮助 返回顶部