期刊文献+

外伤性急性脑肿胀CT分型与临床治疗探讨 被引量:3

The CT Typing and Clinical Therapeutic Study for Post-traumatic Acute Brain Swelling
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨外伤性急性脑肿胀患者的CT分型及治疗方法。方法对72例外伤性急性脑肿胀患者,根据其24h内CT征象中线结构是否移位>5mm为标准,分为A、B、C三组:一侧半球脑肿胀,但中线移位≤5mm为A组;中线移位>5mm为B组;双侧半球弥漫性脑肿胀,不论中线是否移位为C组,分析治疗效果。结果A、B和C三组患者手术生存率分别是78.6%、76.2%和40.0%。A、B组和C组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A、B组手术与非手术生存率为77.1%和38.4%(P<0.05);C组手术与非手术生存率为40%和33.3%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论根据CT分型选择不同的治疗方式及恰当的手术时机是提高TABS生存率的关键。 Objective To investigate the CT typing and therapeutic measures of traumatic acute brain swelling(TABS).Methods Clinical efficiency was studied,72 cases with TABS were divided into 3 group based on CT scanning middle line shift more or less than 5 mm within 24 hours:Hemisphere brain swelling plus middle line shift less than 5 mm(group A),middle line shift more than 5 mm(group B),and bilateral brain swelling(group C,despite of shift).Results The post-operation survival rates of group A,B and group C were78.6%,76.2% and 40% respectively.There was a very significant difference between group A,B and group C(P〈0.05).The group A,B survival rates of operation and non-operation were 77.1% and 38.4% respectively(P〈0.05),while the survival rates of operation and non-operation of group C were 40.0% and 33.3%,the difference was not significant(P〉0.05).Conclusion To select difference measures according to the CT typing and appropriate operational occasion were key to reduce the mortality of TABS.
出处 《中华全科医学》 2010年第4期422-422,465,共2页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
关键词 脑外伤 脑肿胀 CT 临床治疗 Brain injuries Brain swelling CT Clinical therapeutics
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献62

共引文献164

同被引文献45

  • 1常文海,吴新立,张五中,张俊杰,徐永康,姬馨彤.急性外伤性脑肿胀的CT征象及预后[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2000,5(z1). 被引量:1
  • 2黄少伟,吴全理,李齐广,王光绿.颅脑损伤后急性脑肿胀CT动态观察[J].中华神经外科疾病研究杂志,2005,4(6):544-545. 被引量:5
  • 3陈晓东,曹作为,史克珊,金虎,李钢.创伤后迟发性脑肿胀的临床特点与治疗[J].中华神经医学杂志,2007,6(2):158-160. 被引量:2
  • 4Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Bogaev CA, et al. Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumaticcerebral edema [ J ]. Neurosurgery, 1997,41( 1 ) : 84-92.
  • 5Bao YH, Liang YM, Gao GY, et al. Bilateral decompressive cranieetomy for patients with malignant diffuse brain swelling after severe traumatic braininjury:a 37-case study [ J ]. J Neurotrauma, 2010,27 (2) :341-347.
  • 6Whilfield PC, Patel H, Hutchinson PJ, et al. Bifrontal decompressive cranieetomy in the management of posttraumatic intracranial hypertension[J]. Br J Neurosnrg,2001,15(6) :500607.
  • 7Juul N, Morris GF, Marshall SB, et al. Intracranial hypertension and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence on neurological deterioration and outcome in severe head injury. The Executive Committee of the International Selfotel Trial [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 2000,92( 1 ) :1-6.
  • 8Donkin JJ, Vink R. Mechanisms of cerebral edema in traumatic brain injury : therapeutic developments [ J ]. Curr Opin Neurol, 2010.23 ( 3 ):293-299.
  • 9Miller P, Mack CD, Sammer M, et al. The incidence and risk factors for hypotension during emergent decompressive craniotomy in children with traumatic brain injury[ J]. Anesth Analg, 2006, 103 (4) :869-875.
  • 10Sharma D, Brown MJ, Curry P, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for intraoperative hypotension during craniotomy for traumatic brain injury [ J ]. J Neurosurg Anesthesio1,2012,24 ( 3 ) : 178-184.

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部