期刊文献+

公共政策体制论纲 被引量:1

Analytical Study of Public Policy System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公共政策体制概念及其研究维度的缺失,妨碍中国政策学界对政策活动过程做出更具说服力的解释,因此有必要弥补这一被忽视的环节。公共政策体制的概念界定于三个前提性假设基础之上,即民主条件下的政策共同体、政策共同体的结构化及其状态的稳定性、结构—功能间的关联性。公共政策体制可被定义为政策共同体的结构状态和关系模式,它通过转换者、约束者、仲裁者、确认者和变革者角色作用于政策过程。公共政策体制研究维度,有利于填补政府—社会这两种政策活动领域之间的沟壑,衔接正式与非正式的政策活动及其规则,融合静态与动态、个体与集体分析,统合对各个政策环节的理解从而超越政策阶段论的局限。 The lack of concept of public policy system and its research dimension in China has been an obstacle prohibiting the scholars in the circle to make the profound and convincing explanation of the process of policy activities.This paper raises the idea that the definition of the concept of public policy system based on three hypothetical premises,such as,policy community under democratic condition,the pattern orientation of policy community and the stability,and,the connection of structure and function.Therefore,public policy system can be defined as the pattern condition and relation model of policy community that play the roles in policy process as transformer,restrictor,judge,conformer and reformer.To clearly define the research domain of public policy system can cover the rift between government and society,connect the formal and informal policy activities and their rules,combine the dynamic and static,individual and collective analysis,therefore to surpass the restriction of policy theory with periodic features.
出处 《吉林大学社会科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期107-114,共8页 Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基金 教育部重大课题攻关项目(04JZD00017) 河北省社会科学基金项目(HB08BZZ001)
关键词 公共政策 公共政策体制 政策过程 政策研究 public policy public policy system policy process policy studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献16

  • 1A. Comte, System of Positive Polity: London: Longmans Green, 1975, pp. 241~242.
  • 2H.Spencer, The Principles of Sociology, Volume 1, New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1925, p. 505.
  • 3T. Parsons, Working Papers in the Theory of Action,New York: Free Press, 1953; T. Parsons, Economy and Society, New York: Free Press, 1956; T. Parsons, Sociological Theory and Modern Society, New York: Free Press, 1967.
  • 4R. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure, New York:Free Press, 1968.
  • 5Jeffrey Alexander, "Neofunctionalism: AnIntroduction",in Alexander, ed. , Neofunctionalism, Sage, 1985, pp. 7~20;"Neofunctionalism Today: Reconstructing a Theoretical Tradition, with P. Colomy", in G. Ritzer, ed. , Frontiers of Sociological Theory, Columbia University Press, 1990, pp. 33~67.
  • 6Keith Dowding.Explaining Urban Regimes.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2001,Vol 25(1).
  • 7Kevin Ward.Rereading urban regime theory:a sympathetic critique.Critical reviews (427-438).
  • 8Clarence N.Stone,It's More Than the Economy After All:Continuing the Debate about Urban Regimes,Journal of Urban Affairs,2004,Volume 26,Number 1,Pages 1-19.
  • 9David L.Imbroscio,Overcoming The Neglect Of Economics In Urban Regime Theory,Journal Of Urban Affairs,2003,Volume 25,Number 3.
  • 10Davies,J.S..Urban regime theory:A normative -empirical critique.Journal of Urban Affairs,2002,24(1),1-17.

共引文献207

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部