期刊文献+

断索导致的斜拉桥结构易损性分析 被引量:19

Vulnerability Analysis of Cable-stayed Bridge Due to Cable Failures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出从损伤场景对结构性能的影响程度和损伤场景占结构体系总体规模的比例两个参数进行结构易损性分析的方法,并以斜拉桥结构体系为对象,分别以主梁最小屈曲安全系数和最大应力安全系数作为结构性能参数,对不同位置拉索断裂的损伤场景进行了易损性分析.以某斜拉桥为例,采用提出的易损性分析方法,从众多的拉索断裂损伤场景中得到了造成后果尽可能严重而自身占结构比例尽可能低的易损场景.分析结果明确了结构对不同位置拉索断裂的敏感性,可以作为结构健康监测中监测内容选取以及传感器布设的参考依据. This paper presents a bi-parameters structural vulnerability analysis method with the damage consequence and the relative magnitude of the damage scenarios to the structural system as two parameters.The proposed method was applied to the study of the cable-stayed bridge vulnerability to cable failure scenarios by taking the minimum stability factor and the maximum stress safety factor of the main girder as the structural performance measurements.A case study was made of the cable-stayed bridge to illustrate the proposed method.The vulnerable scenarios with a higher consequence but lower magnitude were found.The simulation revealed the structural sensitivity to cable failure scenarios.The analysis results can thus be referenced for designing the structural members to be monitored and the sensor allocation of a structural monitoring system.
作者 于刚 孙利民
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期323-328,共6页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(50538020) 土木工程防灾国家重点实验室自主研究课题基金资助项目(SLDRCE08-A-05)
关键词 易损性 斜拉桥 损伤场景 健康监测 vulnerability cable-stayed bridge damage scenario structural health monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Agarwal J, Blockley D, Woodman N. Vulnerability of 3- dimensional trusses[J]. Structural Safety, 2001,23 (3): 203.
  • 2Agarwal J, Blockley D, Woodman N. Vulnerability of structural systems[J]. Structural Safety, 2003,25 (3) : 263.
  • 3Pinto J T,Blockley D I, Woodman N J. The risk of vulnerable failure[J]. Structural Safety,2002,24(2/4) :107.
  • 4柳承茂,刘西拉.基于刚度的构件重要性评估及其与冗余度的关系[J].上海交通大学学报,2005,39(5):746-750. 被引量:99
  • 5邱德锋,周艳,刘西拉.突发事故中结构易损性的研究[J].四川建筑科学研究,2005,31(2):55-59. 被引量:15
  • 6Liu C M, Liu X L. Structural vulnerability analysis of three dimensional truss[C]// IABSE Symposium on Structures and Extreme Events. Lisbon: ETH Honggerberg, 2005 : 1 - 8.
  • 7Yu G, Sun Z, Sun L M. Vulnerable component monitoring., a novel concept for health monitoring of complex structures [C/CD]// Structural Health Monitoring & Intelligent Infrastructure. Vancouver: ISIS Canada Corporation, 2007.
  • 8Yu G, Sun Z, Sun L M. Structural vulnerability analysis for capacity assessment and enhancement of truss bridges[C/CD] //The 10th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability. Osaka: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.
  • 9林辉,陈艾荣.基于恐怖袭击的桥梁设计[J].世界桥梁,2009,37(2):17-20. 被引量:7
  • 10李国豪,项海帆,沈祖炎,等.桥粱结构稳定与振动[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2002.

二级参考文献24

  • 1周濂.双子大厦坍塌后的反思[J].Newton-科学世界,2001(10):62-67. 被引量:3
  • 2周艳,张雷明,刘西拉.美国Cypress高架桥地震倒塌的仿真分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(17):3035-3044. 被引量:15
  • 3Shelton Henry H.Joint Tactics,Techniques and Procedures for Antiterrorism[R].Washington DC:US Department of Defense,1998.
  • 4Mark G Stewart,Michael D Netherton,David V Rosowsky.Terrorism Risks and Blast Damage to Built Infrastructure[J].Natural Hazards Review,2006,7(3):114-122.
  • 5Maria Leung,James H Lambert,Alexander Mosenthal.A Risk-Based Approach to Setting Priorities in Protecting Bridges Against Terrorist Attacks[J].Risk Analysis,2004,24(4):963-984.
  • 6Eric B Williamson,David G Winget.Risk Management and Design of Critical Bridges for Terrorist Attacks[J].Journal of Bridge Engineering,2005,10(1):96-106.
  • 7AW Beeby. Safety of structures and a new approach to robustness. The Structural Engineer[J].1999,77(4): 16-21.
  • 8.土建结构工程的安全性与耐久性[A]..工程科技论坛[C].中国工程院土木水利建筑学部等,2001..
  • 9Discussion: Safety of structures, and a new approach to robustness. The Structural Engineer, 1999, 77(18):25-30.
  • 10SCOSS. 10th Report of the Standing Committee on Structural Safety UK, 1994.

共引文献110

同被引文献219

引证文献19

二级引证文献127

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部