期刊文献+

基于基元前景交叉判断的前景价值模型 被引量:8

Prospect value model via cross judgments of basic prospects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对现有概率权重非参数确定方法存在的两方面缺陷,即因假设概率权重仅与概率有关而没有考虑概率权重受概率与结果共同影响的问题和没有针对决策者主观判断不准确性予以判断偏差有效控制的问题,通过引入两两比较思维构建了反映概率和结果对概率权重复杂影响的基元前景两两比较交叉判断新模式,并在此基础上运用误差控制优化技术提出了基元前景价值确定模型和前景优劣排序模型.数值模拟分析结果表明,应用前景优劣排序模型得到的前景排序与"假定能够事先知道、能够真实反映决策者在有限理性下实际选择行为"的真实排序具有高度一致性,证实了其克服现有非参数法固有缺陷的有效性. There are two drawbacks in current nonparametric methods for eliciting probability weights (PW). One is no consideration of PWs being influenced by both probabilities and outcomes due to the viewpoint of PWs being influenced only by probability. The other is that there is no means of effectively controlling subjec- tive judgment errors due to less consideration of the inaccurateness of subjective judgments. To overcome these shortages, a new mode of basic prospect cross judgments (BPCJ) for reflecting complex relations of probabili- ties and outcomes on PWs is presented by the thought of pairwise comparison. Based on BPCJs, a value-deter- mination model for basic prospects and a ranking model for prospect choice, are developed through an error- controlling optimization technique for subjective judgments. The analysis results of numerical simulation show that the prospect ranking derived by the application model is highly consistent with the ranking of the decision- maker' s real preferences supposed to be known prior to the simulation, and that the models can well overcome the drawbacks as mentioned above.
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期12-23,共12页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70732005) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(7097105470471015) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划资助项目(09YJA630047) 吉林省软科学研究资助项目(20080610) 吉林大学‘211’工程资助项目 吉林大学基本科研业务费资助项目(2008JC012)
关键词 前景理论 行为决策 基元前景 两两比较判断 交叉判断 prospect theory behavioral decision-making basic prospect pairwise comparison judgment cross judgment
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory : An analysis of decisions under risk [ J ]. Econometrica, 1979, 47 (2) : 313 - 327.
  • 2Humphrey S J, Verschoor A. The probability weighting function: Experimental evidence from Uganda, India and Ethiopia [J]. Economics Letters, 2004, 84(3) : 419 -425.
  • 3Fehr-Duda H, de Gennaro M, Schubert R. Gender, financial risk, and probability weights[J]. Theory and Decision, 2006, 60(2 -3) : 283 -313.
  • 4Prelec D. The probability weighting function[ J ]. Econometrica, 1998, 66 (3) : 497 - 528.
  • 5Currim I S, Sarin R K. Prospect versus utility[J]. Management Science, 1989, 35(1) : 22 -41.
  • 6Bleichrodt H, Pinto J L. A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis [ J ]. Management Science, 2000, 46(11 ) : 1485 - 1496.
  • 7Abdellaoui M. Parameter-free elicitation of utilities and probability weighting functions [ J ]. Management Science, 2000, 46 (11): 1497 -1512.
  • 8徐泽水.语言多属性决策的目标规划模型[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(2):9-17. 被引量:40
  • 9Dyer J S, Jia J. Relative risk-value models[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 103( 1 ) : 170 - 185.
  • 10Tamura H. Behavioral models for complex decision analysis[ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 66 (3) : 655 - 665.

二级参考文献21

  • 1徐泽水.纯语言多属性群决策方法研究[J].控制与决策,2004,19(7):778-781. 被引量:68
  • 2王文平.不完备信息下的多目标优化方法研究[J].系统工程学报,1996,11(2):1-6. 被引量:17
  • 3Fan Z P,Ma J,Zhang Q.An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2002,131(1):101-106.
  • 4Park K S,Kim S H.Tools for interactive multi-attribute decision making with incompletely identified information[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1997,98(1):111-123.
  • 5Kim S H,Ahn B S.Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1999,116(3):498-507.
  • 6Kim S H,Choi S H,Kim J K.An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information:Range-based approach[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1999,118(1):139-152.
  • 7Bordogna G,Fedrizzi M,Passi G.A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operator[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics,1997,27:126-132.
  • 8Levrat E,Voisin A,Bombardier S,Bremont J.Subjective evaluation of car seat comfort with fuzzy techniques[J].International Journal of Intelligent Systems,1997,12:891-913.
  • 9Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E,Martínez L.A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,114:43-58.
  • 10Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E.Linguistic decision analysis:Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,115:67-82.

共引文献39

同被引文献145

引证文献8

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部