期刊文献+

EFL写作中教师作文书面反馈研究——学生评估,教师自我评估,教师实际书面反馈与教师教学理念

Teacher Written Feedback in EFL Writing——Student Perceptions,Teacher Self-assessment,Actual Teacher Performance and Teachers' Beliefs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 鉴于目前国内关于EFL写作教师反馈的研究中,很少涉及教师对其反馈的自我评估的情况,系统研究了英语作为外语时,教师对作文反馈自我评估的内容、意义和作用。主要研究了以下内容:(1)教师的书面反馈中就整体和局部的反馈各占多少。(2)教师的自我评估和学生对教师书面反馈的评估的吻合程度。(3)教师对书面反馈的自我评估和教师的实际书面反馈的吻合程度。研究结果表明:教师书面反馈的重点仍然是文章的局部问题。教师的自我评估和学生对教师书面反馈的评估的吻合程度低,教师倾向高估所给出的反馈的量,反映出学生希望获得更多的教师书面反馈。而教师的自我评估和教师的实际书面反馈的吻合程度为66%,教师能比较准确地评估就作文局部所给出反馈的量,却倾向高估就作文整体所给出反馈的量。 Of researches on teacher written feedback in EFL writing, few researches are about teacher serf-assessment of their written feedback. The focus of this research was: (1)how much local and global written feedback teachers give. (2)how tcachers' serf-assessment and students' perceptions of this feedback match. ( 3 ) how teachers' serf-assessments match their actual performance. The resuhs indicated that teachers put more emphasis on local feedback than global feedback; teacher serf-assessment didn't match student perceptions well; compared with their actual written feedback, teachers tend to overestimate their global feedback.
作者 王芳
出处 《黑龙江教育学院学报》 2010年第3期46-49,共4页 Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education
关键词 英语外语写作 教师自我评估 教师书面反馈 EFL writing teacher serf-assessment teacher written feedback
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1王俊菊.总体态度、反馈类型和纠错种类——对大学英语教师作文书面反馈的探讨[J].国外外语教学,2006(3):24-30. 被引量:103
  • 2Julie L.Montgomery,Wendy Baker Teacher-written feedback:Student perceptions,teacher self-assessment,and actual teacher performance[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2007,(16):82-99.
  • 3Fathman,A.,Whalley,E.Teacher response to student writing:Focus on form versus content.In B.,Kroll(Ed.),Second language writing:Research insights for the classroom[G].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990:178-190.
  • 4Kepner,C.G.An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills[J].Modem Language Journal,1991,(75):305-313.
  • 5Sheppard,K.Two feedback types:Do they make a difference?[J].RELC Journal,1992,(23):103-110.
  • 6杨敬清.提高英语写作评改有效性的反馈机制──实验与分析[J].外语界,1996(3):41-45. 被引量:170
  • 7Ashwell,T.Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom:Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2000,(9):227-257.
  • 8Lalande,J.F.Reducing composition errors:An experiment[J].Modern Language Journal,1982,(66):140-149.
  • 9Ferris,D.R.,& Roberts,B.Error feedback in L2 writing classes:How explicit does it need to be?[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2001,(10):161-184.
  • 10Chandler,J.Response to Truscott[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2009,(28):57-58.

二级参考文献37

共引文献320

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部