期刊文献+

APACHEⅡ评分系统在神经系统危重症患者预后评估中的应用 被引量:9

The application of APACHEⅡ score system in the nervous system to assess prognosis of critically ill patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨APACHEⅡ评分系统在神经危重症患者预后评估中的应用价值。方法54例神经危重症患者纳入研究。所有患者在入ICU24h内进行APACHEⅡ评分,评分以各项指标最差值计算。按照预后分为死亡组和生存组,以13分为界,将患者分为低分组(≤13分)和高分组(>13分)。结果本组有15例患者死亡,其余39例存活。死亡组APACHEⅡ评分(18±2.10),存活组(9.95±3.55),两组比较P<0.05。低分组42例,病死率14.3%;高分组12例,病死率75.0%,两组比较P<0.05。对APACHEⅡ分值和预后做相关性分析,r=-0.664,P<0.05。对APACHEⅡ分值和预后做Logistic回归分析,r=0.437,95%可信区间(0.271,0.705),P<0.05。构筑出ROC曲线,曲线下面积为0.89。结论APACHEⅡ评分系统可以较为准确地判断患者的预后。 Objective To investigate the value of APACHEⅡ score system in the nervous system to assess prognosis of critically ill patients.Methods The 54 patients were involved.All patients were scored by the worst index level in the APACHEⅡ score system within 24 hour after admission.the patients were separated into dead group and living group according to their prognosis.And they were separated into high score group(〉13) and low score group(≤13) according to the score of APACHEⅡ scores.Results 15 patients die,and another 39 patients were living.The score of dead group was(18±2.10),and the living group was(9.95±3.35),P〈0.05.42 patients were in low score group,and their mortality was 14.3%,12 patients were high scored,their mortality was 75.0%,P〈0.05.The correlation analysis between the score and prognosis were performed,r=-0.644,P〈0.05.The Logistics analysis showed r=0.437,95%CI(0.271,0.705),P〈0.05,To construct the ROC curve,the area under the ROC curve was 0.89.Condusion The APACHEⅡ score system was effective in assessing the prognosis of critically ill patients in nervous system.
出处 《四川医学》 CAS 2010年第3期307-309,共3页 Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词 APACHEⅡ 预后 神经系统 APACHEⅡ prognosis nervous system
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

  • 1梁建业.危重病患者病情评定法——APACHE系统的研究进展[J].中国危重病急救医学,1996,8(1):52-56. 被引量:65
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33022
  • 3Knaus WA,Zimmerman JE,Wagner DP,et al.APACHEⅡ:a severity of disease classification system.Crit Care Med,1985,13:818.
  • 4Metz CE.Some practical issues of experimental design and analysis in radiological ROC studies.Invest Radiol,1989,24:234-245.
  • 5Sirio CA,Tajimi K,Knaus WA,et al.An initial comparison of intensive care in Japan and the United States.Crit Care Med,1992,20:1207-1215.
  • 6Rowan KM,Kerr JH,Major E,et al.Intensive Care Society's APACHEⅡStudy in Britain and Ireland Ⅱ:outcome comparison of intensive care units after adjustment for care mix by the American APACHEⅡ method.BMJ,1993,307:977-981.
  • 7Oh TE,Hutchinson R,Short S,et al.Verification of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit.Crit Care Med,1993,21:698.
  • 8Cho DY,Wang YC.Comparison of the APACHEⅢ,APACHEⅡ and Glasgow Come Scale in acute head injury for prediction of mortality and functional outcome.Intensive Care Med,1997,23:77-84.
  • 9Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE Ⅱ: a severity of diseasa classification system[J]. Crit Care Med,1985,13(10):818
  • 10Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and analysis in radiological ROC studies[J]. Invest Radiol, 1989,24: 234- 245

共引文献35

同被引文献74

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部