期刊文献+

关联竞赛模型参与选择及均衡策略

Equilibrium analysis for affiliated effort contests model
原文传递
导出
摘要 在独立努力竞赛模型中,参与人赢得竞赛的概率与自身的投入正相关.本论文提出一种关联努力竞赛模型刻画参与人之间努力程度的关联性.研究了关联程度强弱对参与决策的影响.分析了当竞赛组织者设立最低参与努力程度时参与人的参与选择以及努力决策,得到参与人赢得的概率与自身投入之间的正相关性不再成立、参与人之间不存在纯参与均衡策略的结论. The winning probability of player in the contest depends not only on the player's effort,but on the opposition's participate strategy.In this paper,we construct an affiliated effort Contests model to depict the paly's winning probability and test the first-order necessary conditions to the existence of Nash equilibrium.Under the power distribution value,we analyzed the Nash equilibrium of symmetric and asymmetric value model.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期501-505,共5页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(60574071 60534080)
关键词 竞赛 均衡策略 关联努力 contest strategy equilibria correlated effort
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitve sealed tenders[J]. Journal of Finance, 1961, 16: 8-37.
  • 2Tullock G. The welfare costs of tariffs, monopoples and the theft[J]. Western Economic Journal, 1967, 5: 224-232.
  • 3Athey S. Single crossing properties and the existence of pure strategy equilibria in games of incomplete information[J]. Econometrica, 2001, 69: 861-890.
  • 4Reny P, Zamir S. On the existence of pure strategy monotone equilibria in asymmetric first-price auctions[J]. Econometrica, 2004, 72:1105-1126.
  • 5Chen C, Aner S. Allocation of prizes in asymmetric all-pay auctions[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 2008, 24: 123-132.
  • 6Mark F. Rent-seeking contests with incomplete information[J]. Public Choice, 2008, 135: 225-236.
  • 7Ron S. All-pay contests[J]. Econometrica, 2009, 77(1): 71-92.
  • 8Nti K O. Maximum efforts in contests with asymmetric valuations[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 2004, 20(4): 1059-1066.
  • 9乔恒,邱菀华.递增奖品R&D竞赛的模型设计与均衡分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(4):77-80. 被引量:7
  • 10Che Y K. Optimal design of research contest[J]. American Economic Review, 2003, 96: 646-671.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Amegashie J A.An all-pay auction with a pure-strategy equilibrium[J].Economics Letters,2001,70:79-82.
  • 2Fang H.Lottery versus all-pay auction models of lobbying[J].Public Choice,2002,112:351-371.
  • 3Konrad K A,Schlesinger H.Rent-seeking and rent-augmenting games[J].The Economic Journal,1997,107:1671-1683.
  • 4Smith J M.The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts[J].Journal of Theoretical Biology,1974,47:209-221.
  • 5Skaperdas S.Contest success functions[J].Economic Theory,1996,11:283-290.
  • 6Tullock G.The welfare costs of tariffs,monopolies,and theft[J].Western Economic Journal,1967,5:224-32.
  • 7Vickrey W.Counterspeculation,auctions and competitive sealed tenders[J].Journal of Finance,1961,16:8-37.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部