期刊文献+

药品专利保护的博弈分析——兼论“公地悲剧”与“反公地悲剧”研究现状

Game Theory Analysis of Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products:Research on the Actualities of Tragedies of the Commons and the Anti-Commons
下载PDF
导出
摘要 加强药品专利保护才能避免"公地悲剧",促进医药产业的发展,但目前医药产业"专利丛林"现象,极易造成专利成果利用不足和上游基础研究被闲置的"反公地悲剧",为此学界在理论研究和实证分析中形成了"药品专利消极主义"和"药品专利积极主义"两种不同观点,论文指出"药品专利消极主义"更具有可信度。 If patent protection of pharmaceutical products is strengthened, the tragedy of the commons can be avoided and the development of pharmaceutical industry can be promoted. However, the current phenomenon of "patent thicket" in the pharmaceutical industry tends to bring about the insufficient use of patent achievements and the tragedy of the anti-commons, as nobody is likely to do relevant basic research. In this respect, the academic circles stand in two different groups, one holding a negative attitude toward pharmaceutical patent and the other a positive one in doing theoretical research and empirical analysis. The article points out that the negative attitude is more reliable.
作者 姚颉靖 彭辉
出处 《北京政法职业学院学报》 2010年第1期72-77,共6页 Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
基金 上海市社科规划青年课题项目<人权视野下的公共健康危机与WTO知识产权保护的协调--以后多哈时代的TRIPS协议为中心>的部分成果
关键词 药品专利保护 公地悲剧 反公地悲剧 patent protection for pharmaceutical products tragedy of the commons tragedy of the anti- commons
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1E.Mansfield,M.Schwarz.S.Wagner.Imitation Costs and Oatents.An Empirical Study.Economic Journal,1981, (91) : 907-918.
  • 2E.Mansfield. Patent and Innovation: An Empirical Study. Management Science,1986, (32) : 173-181.
  • 3Wesley M.Cohen, Richard R. Nelson,John P.Walsh. Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Condition and Why U.S.Manufacturing Firms Patent ( or not ) . Conference on New Science and Technology Indicators for the Knowledge-Bases Economy.OECD. 1996.
  • 4Richard C. Levin,Alvin K.Klevorick et al. Aprropriate the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Special Issue on Microeconomics,1987, (3) : 783-831.
  • 5Talyor,C.T.Silberston,Z.A. The Economics Impact of the Patent System: A Study of the British Experience. British: Cambridge University Press. 1973.
  • 6M.Schankerman. How Valuable Patent Protection ? Estimated by Technology Field.RAND Journal of Economics,1998,29 ( 1 ) : 77-107.
  • 7J. H. Taggart Determinants of the foreign R&D locational decision in the pharmaceutical industry. REeD Management,2007,21 (3) : 229-240.
  • 8Harvey E,Bale Jr.Patent Protection and Pharmaceutical Innovation. Now York University Journal oflnternational Law and Politics, 1996, (29): 95-102.
  • 9F.M.Scherer, S.Weisburst. Economic Effects of Strengthening Pharmaceutical Patent Protection in Italy. Patents: Economics, Policy and Measurement. MA: Edward Elgar Pubishing.2005.
  • 10B.Pazderka. Patent Protection and Pharmaceutical R&D Spending in Canada. Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques, 1999,25 (1):29-46.

二级参考文献12

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部