期刊文献+

The evolution of complex brains and behaviors in African cichlid fishes 被引量:1

The evolution of complex brains and behaviors in African cichlid fishes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In this review, I explore the effects of both social organization and the physical environment, specifically habitatcomplexity, on the brains and behavior of highly visual African cichlid fishes, drawing on examples from primates and birdswhere appropriate. In closely related fishes from the monophyletic Ectodinii clade of Lake Tanganyika, both forces influencecichlid brains and behavior. Considering social influences first, visual acuity differs with respect to social organization (monogamyversus polygyny). Both the telencephalon and amygdalar homologue, area Dm, are larger in monogamous species. Monogamousspecies are found to have more vasotocin-immunoreactive cells in the preoptic area of the brain. Habitat complexityalso influences brain and behavior in these fishes. Total brain size, telencephalic and cerebellar size are positively correlated withhabitat complexity. Visual acuity and spatial memory are enhanced in cichlids living in more complex environments. Howeverhabitat complexity and social forces affect cichlid brains differently. Taken together, our field data and plasticity data suggest thatsome of the species-specific neural effects of habitat complexity could be the consequence of the corresponding social correlates.Environmental forces, however, exert a broader effect on brain structures than social ones do, suggesting allometric expansion ofthe brain structures in concert with brain size and/or co-evolution of these In this review, I explore the effects of both social organization and the physical environment, specifically habitat complexity, on the brains and behavior of highly visual African cichlid fishes, drawing on examples from primates and birds where appropriate. In closely related fishes from the monophyletic Ectodinii clade of Lake Tanganyika, both forces influence cichlid brains and behavior. Considering social influences first, visual acuity differs with respect to social organization (monogamy versus polygyny). Both the telencephalon and amygdalar homologue, area Dm, are larger in monogamous species. Monogamous species are found to have more vasotocin-immunoreactive cells in the preoptic area of the brain. Habitat complexity also influences brain and behavior in these fishes. Total brain size, telencephalic and cerebellar size are positively correlated with habitat complexity. Visual acuity and spatial memory are enhanced in cichlids living in more complex environments. However habitat complexity and social forces affect cichlid brains differently. Taken together, our field data and plasticity data suggest that some of the species-specific neural effects of habitat complexity could be the consequence of the corresponding social correlates. Environmental forces, however, exert a broader effect on brain structures than social ones do, suggesting allometric expansion of the brain structures in concert with brain size and/or co-evolntion of these structures [Current Zoology 56 (1): 144-156, 2010].
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期144-156,共13页 动物学报(英文版)
基金 supported by NSF grants IBN-02180005 to Caroly Shumway (CAS) and IBN-021795 to Hans Hofmann (HAH) a German-American Research Networking Program grant to CAS and HAH the New England Aquarium to CAS the Bauer Center for Genomics Research to HAH
关键词 鲷科鱼类 大脑 行为 非洲 一夫一妻制 物种特异性 灵长类动物 社会组织 Fish, Evolution, Brain, Behavior, Social organization, Habitat complexity
  • 相关文献

参考文献118

  • 1Adolf B, Chapouton P, Lain CS, Topp S, Tannhauser Bet al, 2006. Conserved and acquired features of adult neurogenesis in the zebrafish telencephalon. Dev. Biol. 295: 278-293.
  • 2Amores A, Force A, Yan YL, Joly L, Amemiya C et al., 1998. Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282: 1711-1714.
  • 3Barlow GW, 2000. The cichlid fishes: Nature's grant experiment in evolution. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
  • 4Beauchamp G, Femhndez-Juricic E, 2004. Is there a relationship between forebrain size and group size in birds? Evol. Ecol. Res. 6: 833-842.
  • 5Bialek W, 1987. Physical limits to sensation and perception. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Chem. 16: 455-478.
  • 6Bielsky IF, Hu SB, Szegda KL, Westphal H, Young L J, 2004. Profound impairment in social recognition and reduction in anxiety-like behavior in vasopressin Vla receptor knockout mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 29: 483-493.
  • 7Brodbeck DR, 1994. Memory for spatial and local cues: a comparison of a storing and a nonstoring species. Anim. Learning Behav. 22: 119-133.
  • 8Brown C, Warburton K, 1997. Predator recognition and anti-predator responses in the rainbowfish Melanotaenia eachamensis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 61-68.
  • 9Bshary R, Wickler W, Fricke H, 2002. Fish cognition: a primate's eye view. Anita. Cogn. 5: 1-13.
  • 10Budeau DA, Verts BJ, 1986. Relative brain size and structural complexity of habitats of chipmunks. J. Mature. 67:579- 581.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部