期刊文献+

安博维与依伦平治疗原发性高血压的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of the irbesartan and irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide-regiment on treating primary hypertension
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对安博维与依伦平治疗原发性高血压进行比较研究。方法将132例入选血压90 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)≤舒张压(DBP)<110 mm Hg,且收缩压(SBP)<180 mm Hg的来院治疗的患者分成两组,一组(n=62)加用安博维(厄贝沙坦)150 mg,每日1次;另一组(n=70)加用依伦平(厄贝沙坦150 mg+氢氯噻嗪12.5 mg)片,每日1次,观察8周,对两组血压、心率、血压达标率、降压有效率、不良反应进行比较。结果两组在分组后1周SBP、DBP和脉压(PP)均开始下降,依伦平组在分组后1周,安博维在分组后2周SBP、DBP和PP下降幅度较分组时差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组间SBP、DBP和PP在整个观察期内相比,同时间随访观察值、心率(HR)差异无统计学意义。结论安博维与依伦平在治疗原发性高血压方面的疗效、安全性和耐受性方面均较好,相比之下依伦平起效更快,降压有效率、达标率更高,是原发性高血压治疗的理想用药。 Objective To study the irbesartan and irbesartan/hydrochlorthiazide-regiment comparatively treating for primary hypertension.Methods One hundred and thirty-two patients whose blood pressure 90 mm Hg≤DBP〈110 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa),and SBP180 mm Hg have been divided into two groups,one group(n=62) received irbesartan(150 mg/d),the other group(n=70) received irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide regiment(150 mg irbesartan+12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide regiment) per day,and all observed for 8 weeks,comparatively study index such as BP,HR,target achieving rate,depressurization effective power,adverse effect etc.Results After two groups have been treated with drug for one week,SBP,DBP and PP begin to descend,irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide-regiment group on the first week,the descending extent of SBP,DBP and PP had significant difference after 2 weeks in irbesartan group(P〈0.01).During whole observation stage,the follow up observed number,HR of two groups had no significant difference.Conclusion The therapeutic effect,safety,survivability of irbesartan and irbeartan/hydrochlorothiazide-regiment treating for primary hypertension are good,irbeartan/hydrochlorothiazide-regiment play effect quickly,the effective power,target achieving rate of which is higher,so it can be used for lot medication in treating for primary hypertension.
作者 杨弃
出处 《临床医学》 CAS 2010年第1期12-13,共2页 Clinical Medicine
关键词 原发性高血压 安博维 依伦平 Primary hypertension Irbesartan Irbseartan/hydrochlorothiazide regiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献7

  • 1Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial Collaborative Research Group. Diuretic versus alpha-blocker as first-step antihypertensive therapy: final results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Hypertension, 2003,42:239-246.
  • 2Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT). Lancet,2000,29;356:366-372.
  • 3Howe P, Phillips P, Saini R, et al.The antihypertensive efficacy of the combination of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Irbesartan Multicenter Study Group. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1999,21:1373-1396.
  • 4中国高血压防治指南起草委员会.1999中国高血压防治指南[J].高血压杂志,2000,8:94-112.
  • 5European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens,2003,21:1011-1053.
  • 6Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group.Lancet. 1998,351:1755-1762.
  • 7蒋雄京,李卫,马林茂,孔灵芝,金水高,刘力生.医院门诊就诊人群高血压相关知识及其对高血压防治的影响[J].中华流行病学杂志,2002,23(4):269-272. 被引量:40

共引文献2707

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部