期刊文献+

不对称品牌联盟对弱势品牌稀释研究:“攀龙附凤”还是“引火烧身”? 被引量:10

Dilution on Weak Brands from Asymmetrical Brand Alliances:Do Brand Alliances Always Help the Weak?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究借助最小均方联结模型来解释和分析不对称品牌联盟对弱势品牌的稀释作用。同时,利用实验证明了该种稀释作用的存在,而且可以利用业务多元化和品牌互补性来调节或减缓该负面作用。该研究对中国日益盛行的国内和国际品牌联盟提出警示即中国品牌与国际品牌的联合可能由"攀龙附凤"的惊喜落到"引火烧身"的恶果。 This study uses least mean squares connectionist model to demonstrate empirically that asymmetrical brand alliances can result in potential dilution on weak brands paired.Meanwhile,the experiments draw conclusions that the dilution does exist and brand complementarity and business diversification can moderate and relieve the negative impact of asymmetrical brand alliances on the weak partners.These findings warn Chinese brand managers of the bad results from the prevalent co-branding with international strong brand,that is,the dilution from the strong partners on Chinese weak brands.
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期132-141,共10页 China Soft Science
关键词 品牌联盟非对称性 品牌稀释 最小均方模型(LMS) 业务多元化 品牌互补性 brand alliances asymmetry brand dilution Least Mean Squares Connectionist Model(LMS) business diversification brand complementarity
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Rao, A. R. and Ruekert, R. W. , Brand Alliances as Signals of Product Quality [ J ], Sloan Management Review, 1994, 36 (Fall): 87-97.
  • 2Simonin, Bernard L. and Ruth, Julie A. , Is a Company Known By the Company It Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes [ J ] , Journal of Marketing Research, 1998, 35 (February): 30 -42.
  • 3Keller, Kevin Lane, Strategic Brand Management : Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity [ M], 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N J, 2003.
  • 4Keller, L. K. and Lehmann, D. R., Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities [ J], Marketing Science, 2006, 25 (6) : 740 - 759.
  • 5Smith, Eliot R. , What Do Connectionism and Social Psychology Offer Each Other? [ J] , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 70 (May) : 893 -912.
  • 6Dahlen Micael and Lange Fredrik, Advertising Weak and Strong Brands: Who Gains? [J], Psychology & Marketing, 2005, 22 (6) : 473 - 488.
  • 7Dato-on, M. C. & Dahlstrom, R., A Meta- analytic Investigation of Contrast Effects in Decision Making [J].Psychology & Marketing, 2003, 20:707-731.
  • 8Simonson, I., & Tversky, A., Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion [ J ], Journal of Marketing Research, 1992, 29 : 281 - 295.
  • 9Janiszewski, C. , and Osselaer S. M. J. Van, A connectionist model of brand - quality associations [ J ], Journal of Marketing Research, 2000, 37 (August) : 331 -350.
  • 10Rumelhart, David E., James L. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition [ M ], Volume 1 : Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.

同被引文献166

引证文献10

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部