期刊文献+

基于SFA的研制阶段装备保障方案评价模型 被引量:3

SFA-based Evaluation Model of Materiel Support Plan in Product Development Phase
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对目前研制阶段装备保障方案评价在角度和方法上的不足,提出基于随机前沿分析(SFA)的评价模型。首先,分析提炼保障系统的特性,在此基础上,建立保障系统的特性评价参数,然后构建基于SFA的评价模型,通过计算保障方案的效率指数进行保障方案的评价,实现了保障方案的排序,以及评价指标的灵敏度分析。最后,结合研制阶段某型号飞机保障方案给出评价示例,并与数据包络分析(DEA)评价结果进行对比分析,评价结果具有较高的一致性,从而验证了该模型的可行性和有效性,可为研制方在研制阶段保障方案的评价决策和改进设计提供有效的技术支持。 In order to solve the problem that there exist many drawbacks in support plan evaluation in terms of approaches and methods in previous studies,this article presents an evaluation model based on stochastic frontier analysis(SFA).First,support system characteristics are abstracted,based on which the evaluation parameters of support system characteristics are established.Second,a model based on SFA is established to calculate support efficiency indexes for assessing the support plan,and the ranking of alternative support plans is realized.In addition,the sensitivity analysis of evaluation indexes is made.Finally,evaluating a certain type of aircraft support plan is performed as an example.The two evaluation results of the data envelopment analysis(DEA)model and the SFA model demonstrate high consistency according to a comparative analysis of evaluation results.Thus,the feasibility and validity of the evaluation model based on SFA are established.This model can provide excellent decision support for evaluating and improving support plans in the product development phase.
出处 《航空学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期526-531,共6页 Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
基金 国防预研基金(9140A19040407HK01)
关键词 评价 保障方案 随机前沿分析 研制阶段 灵敏度分析 evaluation support plan stochastic frontier analysis(SFA) development phase sensitivity analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1姜晨,赵喜春,殷志祥.基于eEPC的保障方案权衡建模仿真[J].弹箭与制导学报,2007,27(2):320-324. 被引量:5
  • 2Bevilacqua M, Braglia M. The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy seleetion [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2000, 70(1): 71-83.
  • 3U.S. Army Forms Management Officer. Test and evaluation policy[R]. AR 73-1, 2004.
  • 4Lappin M K. Supportability evaluation prediction process [C]//Annual Proceedings of Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1988:102-107.
  • 5Secretary of the Air Force. Determining mission capability and supportability requirements[R]. Afi10 -602, 2005.
  • 6Jones J V. Integrated logistics support handbook[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.
  • 7Blanchard B S. Logistics engineering and management [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2004.
  • 8Kumar U D, Nowicki D, Ramirez-Marquez J E, et al. A goal programming model for optimizing reliability, maintainability and supportability under performance based logistics[J]. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 2007, 14(3) : 251-261.
  • 9刘占伟,邓四二,滕弘飞.复杂工程系统设计方案评价方法综述[J].系统工程与电子技术,2003,25(12):1488-1491. 被引量:20
  • 10何枫,陈荣,何炼成.SFA模型及其在我国技术效率测算中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(5):46-50. 被引量:128

二级参考文献47

  • 1张晓希.效用关联分析在决策分析中的应用[J].经济数学,1994,0(1):125-131. 被引量:2
  • 2任军.气田开发方案模糊加权聚类分析[J].天然气工业,1994,14(2):35-37. 被引量:10
  • 3张劲松,薛春芳,钟毅芳.基于过程链的产品开发过程建模研究[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(5):64-66. 被引量:2
  • 4赵建华,刘朝英.价值工程中方案的模糊评价方法探讨[J].河北省科学院学报,1995,12(3):94-96. 被引量:3
  • 5魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988.218-257.
  • 6蔡文.物元分析[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,1997..
  • 7Farrell M J. The measurement of production efficiency[J]. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 1957,120(3):253-281.
  • 8Afriat S N. Efficiency estimation of production functions[J]. International Economic Review, 1972, 13(3):568-598.
  • 9Aigner D J, Lovell C A K, Schmidt. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production functions models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1977, 6(1):21-37.
  • 10Battese G E, Corra G S. Estimation of a production frontier model: with application to the pastoral zone of eastern australia[J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1977, 21(3):169-179.

共引文献160

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部