期刊文献+

预先信息的不确定性与准备时间对任务切换的影响 被引量:4

The Effect of Foreknowledge and Preparation Time on Task Switching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为揭示任务切换中切换代价的本质,考察了预先信息与准备时间对任务切换的影响,结果发现:(1)预先信息对任务切换有显著的影响效应,全部信息的反应时和切换代价显著低于无信息和部分信息的反应时和切换代价,而后二者之间无显著差异;(2)预先信息的影响效应受到准备时间的调节作用,在准备时间为100ms时,预先信息无显著的影响效应,而在准备时间达到600ms以后,预先信息的准备效应显著。这说明,预先信息影响的认知加工是任务设置重构,并且这种影响效应受到准备时间的调节作用。 In task switching, switch cost is the performance differences in task-switch and task-repetition trials. Recently, some researches have attempted to specify nature and origins of switch cost to uncover the mechanisms underlying task switching performance. Theoretically, there is disagreement as to whether switch cost actually represents the task-set reconfiguration or the task-set inertia. Many studies found that a prolonged preparation time reduces switch costs, which has been attributed to a task set reconfiguration process. However, unlike manipulations of preparation time, other studies varied the predictability of task sequence and found that the preparation benefit was the same for switches and repetitions. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of foreknowledge and preparation time on task switching. Two experiments were conducted in the present study. There were 30 participants (12 males and 18 females) volunteered to take part in experiment 1 and another 30 participants (9 males and 21 females) took part in experiment 2. In order to investigated the effect of foreknowledge on task switching, the experiment 1 was conducted with a 3 (foreknowledge type: no foreknowledge, part foreknowledge and full foreknowledge) x 2 (task type: switch task and repetition task) within-subject design. In the experiment 2, a 3 (preparation time: lOOms, 600ms and 1000ms) x 3 (foreknowledge type: no foreknowledge, part foreknowledge and full foreknowledge) ~ 2 (task type: switch task and repetition task) within-subject design was conducted to examined the mechanisms of effects of foreknowledge on task switching under the conditions of difference preparation time. The correct RT and switch cost were measured as the main index. The results showed that: (1) the amount of switch cost depend on foreknowledge, switch cost was smaller with full foreknowledge than with part and no foreknowledge, but not difference significantly between the later two. (2) The interaction between preparation time and foreknowledge was significant, and with increased preparation time, the effect of foreknowledge was more remarkable. Current findings suggest that the cognitive process that foreknowledge affected was task-set reconfiguration, rather than task-set inertia, and the effect was mediated by preparation time.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期367-376,共10页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"思维过程中的执行加工与自我监控:事件相关脑电位研究"(批准号:30670717)
关键词 任务切换 切换代价 预先信息 执行控制 task switching switch cost foreknowledge executive control
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献46

  • 1史艺荃,周晓林.执行控制研究的重要范式——任务切换[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):672-679. 被引量:21
  • 2齐冰,白学军,沈德立.材料类型和任务可预测性在任务转换中的作用[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):41-44. 被引量:5
  • 3Modern Chinese Frequency Dictionary (in Chinese). Beijing Language Institute Publisher, 1986(现代汉语频率词典.北京语言学院出版社,1986)
  • 4ColletteF, LindenM V. Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2002, 26:105 - 125
  • 5Norman D A, Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davidson R J,Schwartz G E, Shapiro D, editors. Consciousness and self regulation. Advances in research and theory, New York: Plenum Press, 1986. 1 - 18
  • 6Baddeley A D, Hitch G. Working memory. In: Bower G Aed. The psychology of learning and motivation (vol.8). New York: Academic Press, 1974.47 - 89
  • 7Jersild A T, Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology (Whole No. 89), 1927
  • 8Biederman I. Human performance in contingent information processing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology :General, 1972, 93:219 -238
  • 9Allport D A, Styles E A, Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and performance, XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing, MIT Press, 1994. 421 -452
  • 10Dark V. Switching between memory and perception: Moving attention or moving memory retrieval. Memory and Cognition, 1990, 18:119 -127

共引文献11

同被引文献41

  • 1Allport, A. , Wylie, G. (2000). Task switching, stimulusresponse bindings and negative priming. In S. MonseU, J. Driver (Eds.): Attention and performance X Ⅷ: Control of cognitive processes (pp.35-70), MIT Press.
  • 2Altmann, E. M. , Gray, W. D. (2008) . An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115,602-639.
  • 3Ahmann, E. M. (2004). The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA. Memory & Cognition, 32, 153-163.
  • 4Hsieh, S. (2002). Twocomponent processes in switching attention: a study of eventrelated potentials. Perceptual and motor skills, 94, 1168-1176.
  • 5Hsieh, S. (2006). The lateralized readiness potential and P300 of stimulusset switching. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60,284-291.
  • 6Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of psychology. 89, 5-82.
  • 7Koch, I. , & Allport, A. (2006). Cuebased preparation and stimulusbased priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34,433-444.
  • 8Meiran, N., Chorev, Z. , & Sapir, A. (2000). Component Processes in Task Switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41,211-253.
  • 9Monsell, S. (2003) . Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
  • 10Philipp, A. M., Jolicoeur, P., Falkenstein, M., & Koch, I. (2007) . Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a Gosignal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1062-1075.

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部