期刊文献+

率差标准的确定和难度常模的建立——对2004—2009年高考北京卷的实证研究 被引量:3

The Standards for Difficulty Difference and the Construction of Difficulty Norms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 难度常模即具有特定局部区分功能的一组组题目的按难度值排列的有序集合,其核心是难度系数与区分功能的对应关系。题目区分功能的定位是难度常模制作过程的关键一步,本研究为此划分了目标群体和临界参照群体,并结合统计和数学方法为各种区分类型设定了率差数量标准。基于上述方法,结合大量数据统计与分析,高考北京卷各个学科的难度常模得以初步建立,但其发展和完善仍留待数据的进一步积累和研究的进一步深入。 The difficulty norms are the essence of which is the corresponding ordinal sets of item clusters with specific discriminative function, the relationship between difficulty indexes and discriminative function. The recognition of the discriminative function of items is the key process of the construction of difficulty norms. To achieve this goal, target group and reference group have been put forward and the standards for difficulty difference have been set through statistics and analysis. Furthermore, the difficulty norms of each subject of the College Entrance Examination in Beijing have been sketched out based on the study and analysis mentioned above, while the improvement of such norms still depend on the accumulation of data and the extension of research.
机构地区 北京教育考试院
出处 《中国考试》 2010年第3期3-15,共13页 journal of China Examinations
基金 北京市财政项目“高考试题资源库建设”支持
关键词 难度常模 目标群体 目标群体通过率 组间率差 临界参照群体 参照群体通过率 组内率差 效用群体 Difficulty Norms Target Group Target-group Difficulty Difficulty Difference Between Group Reference Group Reference-group Difficulty Difficulty Difference Within Group Function-significant Group
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献5

共引文献17

同被引文献15

  • 1余仁胜.自学考试命题中及格线的校准方法[J].中国考试,2005(6):37-39. 被引量:13
  • 2柳博.自学考试命题质量控制措施刍议[J].中国考试,2006(4):14-17. 被引量:13
  • 3北京教育考试院.2010年普通高等学校招生全国统一考试北京卷考试说明[M].北京:开明出版社.2009.
  • 4American Educational Research Association, American Psycholog- ical Association & National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing[M]. Washing- ton,DC: American Educational Research Association, 1999:1-174.
  • 5Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment[J]. Psychologist, 1995 (9): 941-945.
  • 6Messick S. Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.). Educational measurement (3rd ed.)[C]. New York: Macmillan, 1989:13-103.
  • 7Kane M. T. Concerns in validity theory[J]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2001, 38(4): 319-342.
  • 8Bachman L. F. Statistical Analysis for Language Assessment[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 258.
  • 9Weir C. J. Language Testing and Validation[M]. Palgrave: Macmil- lan. 2005:43-215.
  • 10卢正勇.高等教育自学考试的课程考试效度研究[J].教育与考试,2007(1):17-20. 被引量:3

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部