期刊文献+

论互联网行为导向型广告与美国隐私权保护困境 被引量:1

Online Behavioral Targeting Ads and American Privacy Protection Predicament
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为一种全新的广告模式,互联网行为导向型营销以其出类拔萃的高效性赢得了愈来愈多网络运营商的青睐。但与此同时,其也引发了公众对自身隐私权的担忧。与欧盟不同,尽管面临多方质疑,美国现行法律体制仍然强调行业自律在这一领域的特殊作用。联邦贸易委员会在这一问题上扮演着举足轻重的角色。从立法规制的角度而言,美国相关立法以单行法为主,主要针对特定领域和特定对象进行规制。随着互联网行为导向型广告模式在实践中被广泛运用,并不断得到发展,该应对机制切实保护民众隐私权利益的实效性正面临严峻考验。 As a new advertising tactic, online behavioral targeting becomes increasingly popular among Internet companies. Although practitioners ardently believe in its ability of improving campaign effectiveness, privacy concerns exist. Unlike European Union Laws, the Unite States puts a particular emphasis on industry self-regulation to bolster privacy on Internet. The Federal Trade Commission has been involved in addressing online privacy issues for almost as long as there has been an online marketplace. When it comes to the related legislative rules and regulations, American legislation primarily consists of individual specific laws, its regulation mainly targets specific domain and specific object. As this advertising tactic gets the momentum in utilization and continuously develops, the exigency to overhaul privacy legislation to account for changes in Internet technology is now quite conspicuous Only through prompt and proper adjustment of privacy legislation can populace's right of privacy be adequately protected.
作者 柳镭
机构地区 湖南大学法学院
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2010年第3期82-87,共6页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
关键词 美国法律 隐私权 互联网 行为导向型营销 American Law privacy right Internet behavioral targeting
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748(1976).
  • 2Interactive Advertising Bureau, Inc., press release, Internet Advertising Revenues Continue to Soar, Reach Nearly $10 Billion in First Half of '07; Historic Second Quarter Revenues Exceed $ 5 Billion for First Time (Oct. 4, 2007).
  • 3Schmidt, Eric. Global Privacy Standards are Needed [ N]. Financial Times,2007 -09 - 19.
  • 4Warren, Samuel D, Louis D. Brandeis. The fight to privacy[J]. Harvard Law Review, 1890(4) :193 -220.
  • 5Sanford, Bruce W. Libel and Privacy [ M ]. 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, N. J... Prentice-Hall Law & Business, 1993.
  • 6Denver Publishing v. Bueno, 54 P. 3d 893(2002).
  • 7Estelle T. Griswold and C. Lee Buxton v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
  • 8Jane Roe, et al. v. Henry Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County, 410 U.S. 113 1973.
  • 9John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
  • 10Joseph Turow, Deirdre K. Mulligan & Chris Jay Hoofnagle. Consumer Fundamentally Misunderstand the Online Advertising Marketplace. University of California - Berkeley School of Law, Samuelson Law (Oct. 2007) :3.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部