期刊文献+

外群选择对隧蜂科(膜翅目:蜜蜂总科)系统重建的影响(英文) 被引量:4

Outgroup selection in tree reconstruction:a case study of the family Halictidae(Hymenoptera:Apoidea)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 外群用于给树附根和推断祖先性状状态。通常,来自内群的姐妹群中的多个分类单元被共同选择作为外群。为了在经验上验证这一方法,我们采用了3种外群选择策略:姐妹群中的单一分类单元,姐妹群中的多个分类单元和连续姐妹群中的多个分类单元。以隧蜂科(膜翅目:蜜蜂总科)的系统发育重建为例,我们评估了这3种策略对树拓扑结构的影响,包括最大似然树、最大简约树和贝叶斯树。初步结果表明:相比其他两种策略,采用姐妹群中的多个分类单元作为外群更有利于系统发育重建得到现已被广泛认可的隧蜂科系统发育关系;相比最大似然法和贝叶斯法,虽然隧蜂科系统发育关系没有被很好地解决,但最大简约法在不同外群选择策略下得到了较为一致的拓扑结构。 An outgroup roots a network to form a tree and/or to infer hypothetical ancestral character states. Usually, multiple taxa of a closely related sister group of the ingroup are selected. To empirically evaluate the choice of outgroup, we implemented three strategies of outgroup selection : a single taxon from the sister group, multiple taxa within the sister group, and multiple taxa from successive sister groups. Subsequently, we evaluated their effects on tree topologies within the family Halictidae (Hymenoptera: Apoidea ) incorporating three tree reconstruction methods: maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference. The use of multiple taxa within the sister group produced more consistent results than the other two outgroup strategies. The tree topologies were generally consistent with the putative tree topology of Halictidae. Compared with the other two tree reconstruction methods, maximum parsimony produced more consistent results with different outgroup strategies, yet often obtained less resolution.
出处 《昆虫学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期192-201,共10页 Acta Entomologica Sinica
基金 The Third Phase of the Innovation Program in the Chinese Academy of Sciences Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.30670242 and 30500056) the Major Program from the Natural Science Foundation,Beijing(6081002)
关键词 隧蜂科 非同源相似 单系性 外群 姐妹群 系统发育 Halictidae homoplasy monophyly outgroup sister group phylogeny
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Alexander BA, Michener CD, 1995. Phylogenetic studies of the families of short-tongued bees. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 55 : 377 - 424.
  • 2Bergsten J, 2005. A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics, 21: 163 - 193.
  • 3Cameron SL, Miller KB, D' Haese CA, Whiting MF, Barker SC, 2004. Mitochondrial genome data alone are not enough to unambiguously resolve the relationships of Entognatha, Insecta and Crustacea sensu lato (Arthropoda). Cladistics, 20:534-557.
  • 4Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AW, 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 19:233-257.
  • 5Dalevi D, Hugenhohz P, Blackall LL, 2001. A multiple-outgroup approach to resolving division-level phylogenetic relationships using 16S rDNA data. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 51:385-391.
  • 6Danforth BN, Brady SG, Sipes SD, Pearson A, 2004. Single copy nuclear genes recover Cretaceous-age divergences in bees. Syst. Biol., 53 : 309 -326.
  • 7Danforth BN, Eardley C, Packer L, Walker K, Pauly A, Randrianambinintsoa FJ, 2008. Phylogeny of Halictidae with an emphasis on endemic Mrican Halictinae. Apidologie, 39 : 86 - 101.
  • 8Danforth BN, Fang J, Sipes S, 2006a. Analysis of family-level relationships in bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) using 28S and two previously unexplored nuclear genes : CAD and RNA polymerase II. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 39: 358-372.
  • 9Danforth BN, Sipes S, Fang J, Brad SG, 2006b. The history of early bee diversification based on five genes plus morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103:15 118-15 123.
  • 10De Rijk P, Van de Peer Y, Chapelle S, De Wachter R, 1994. Database on the structure of large ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Res., 22:3 495 -3 501.

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部