期刊文献+

中西方思维方式的文化差异研究——二元对立与连续统合的视角 被引量:5

An Research on the Culture Difference between Chinese and Westerners——Binary Opposition vs. Continuum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:验证中西方在思维方式上存在二元对立与连续统合的差异。方法:通过自编的中西方思维特征问卷,对中国学生47名,以及西方留学生及访问学者43名施测,收回有效问卷中国被试34名,西方被试32名。结果:中西方在思维方式上存在着显著差异,思维方式不存在性别差异。结论:中国人的思维方式是倾向于连续统合的,而西方人的思维方式是倾向于二元对立的。 Objective: To verify there is difference of binary opposition and continuum between Chinese and westerners in the mode of thinking. Methods: Using Self-compiled questionnaire called "questionnaire of the Chinese and Western thinking characteristics" to measure subjects. 47 Chinese students as well as 43 west students and visiting scholars were measured. 66 valid questionnaires (34 Chinese and 32 westerners) were collected. Results: There is significant difference between Chinese and westerners in the mode of thinking. There is no gender difference in the mode of thinking. Conclusion: The Chinese mode of thinking is inclined to continuum, while the westerners' mode of thinking tend to binary opposition.
作者 马丽 滕修攀
出处 《社会心理科学》 2010年第2期13-17,65,共6页 Science of Social Psychology
关键词 思维方式 二元对立 中西方 连续统 差异研究 文化 中国学生 思维特征 mode of thinking binary opposition continuum culture difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Peng K P, Nisbett R E. Wong N Y C. Validity Problems Comparing Values Across Cultures and Possible Solutions. Psychological Methods, 1997, (2): 329-344.
  • 2Hanson C. Language and fogic in ancient China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1983. 31.
  • 3Moore C A. Th e Chinese mind: Essentials of Chinese philosophy and Culture. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1968. 3.
  • 4Chan S F F. Formal Logic and dialectical thinking are not incongruent. American Psychologist, 2000, 55:1063 - 1064.
  • 5Ho D Y F. Dialectical thinking: Neither Eastern nor Western. American Psychologist, 2000, 55:1064 - 1065.
  • 6赵志裕.《中庸思维的测量:一项跨地区研究的初步结果》[J].香港社会科学学报,2000,.
  • 7翟学伟.本土的人际传播研究:“关系”的视角与理论方向[J].新闻与传播研究,2008,15(3):40-43. 被引量:20
  • 8黄丽莉.中国人的和谐观/冲突观:和谐化辩证观之研究取径[J].本土心理学研究,1996,5:47-71.
  • 9杜维明.试谈中国哲学中的三个基调[J].中国哲学研究,1981,(3):19-22.

二级参考文献1

共引文献27

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部