期刊文献+

中国外交战略定位:基于外部环境与国家利益的分析 被引量:2

An Analysis of the Strategic Localization of China's Diplomacy:Based on the External Environment and the National Interests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国面临着复杂的国际环境和多变的国际体系,加之中国自身的实力也发生了极大的变化,这使得国家利益的界定和外交战略的定位十分困难。正确区分中国的核心利益、重要利益、一般利益和无关紧要的利益,是中国外交战略定位的前提。以国家实力为基础,中国的外交战略定位应该坚持:中国第一,亚洲第二,世界第三。以亚太地区大国为基轴,进可由地区政治对国际政治、世界政治发挥有力影响,退可以稳定国内政治,形成国家政治、地区政治、国际政治和世界政治的良性互动。 The international environment confronted by China is extremely complicated, and the international system is dramatically changeful, in addition, extremely large change also happened in China' s strength, so the allocation that Chinese country benefit boundary books with diplomacy strategy is very difficult. That right distinguishes Chinese core interest, important interest, general interest and inessential interest is the premise to localized Chinese diplomacy strategy. Making country strength as basis, Chinese diplomacy strategy should insist that: China' s interest is most important, Asian affairs about China is follow China's own interest, international interest of China ranks last considered by Chinese leader. Take the Asian - Pacific region Great Power as base of the axis, which can brings significant effect from area politics to international politics, world politics, on the other hand, can stabilize the domestic politics, to form the benign interactive between country politics , area politics , international politics and world politics.
作者 肖晞 郎帅
出处 《内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第1期69-72,共4页 Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University:Social Sciences
关键词 中国外交 国家利益 战略定位 国际环境 China' s diplomacy national interests strategic localization international environment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[美]约翰·罗尔克.世界舞台上的国际政治(第9版)[M].宋伟,等,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
  • 2郑永年.中国的崛起及其外交和战略压力[EB/OL].联合早报网,名家专评,2009.
  • 3[美]罗伯特·A·帕斯特编.世纪之旅:七大国百年外交风云[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001.31.5.
  • 4William W. Keller and Thomas G. Rawski, China's Rise and the Balance of Influence in Asia[M]. University of Pittsburgh Press, 2007.
  • 5Avery Goldstein. An Emerging China's Emerging Grand Strategy': A Neo- Bismarckian Tum[A]. in: G. John Ikenberry, and Michael Mastanduno, eds. International Relations Theory and the Asia- Pacific[C]. New York : Columbia University Press, 2003. 57 - 106.
  • 6Aaron Friedberg. Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Pease in a Multipolax Asia[J]. International Security, 1993,18(3) :5 - 33.
  • 7Tom J. Christensen. China, the US - Japan Alliance, and the Security Dilemma in East Asia[A]. in: G. John Ikenberry and Michael Mastanduno, eds. International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific[C]. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003. 25-56.

共引文献2

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部