期刊文献+

社会判断中启发式与偏差的再认识 被引量:2

Rethinking heuristics and bias in social judgments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章对判断决策研究范式发展的三个阶段中启发式与偏差的地位进行了小结,从中引出社会判断的轴心和焦点——启发式与偏差,并结合新近研究对各种启发式与偏差进行了分类与总结,给偏差以客观评价,通过对偏差与错误在结果指向性、发展性、普遍性和适应性上存在差异的分析,论证了偏差不等于错误的观点。 The article summarizes the status of heuristics and biases in the three phases of judgment and deci- sion-making paradigm, from which the axis and focus of the social judgment are drawn heuristics and biases, and based on progress in the research, the paper classifies and sum up various heuristics and biases in an objective way. Then after analyzing four differences between biases and mistakes, it argues that that biases are not equal to mistakes.
出处 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第3期64-68,共5页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 社会判断 启发式 偏差 错误 social judgment heuristics biases mistakes
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1GRONER M, GRONER R, BISCHOF W F. Approaches to Heuristics: A Historical Review [ M ] // R. Groner (Eds.). Methods of Heuristics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.
  • 2SIMON H A. Administrative Behavior[ M]. Now York: Macmillan, 1947.
  • 3斯科特·普劳斯.决策与判断[M].施俊琦,王星译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2004.
  • 4丹尼尔·卡尼曼,保罗·斯罗维奇,阿莫斯·特沃斯.不确定状况下的判断--启发式和偏差[M].方文,吴新利,张擘,等,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
  • 5王沛,王新波.社会判断中的样例激活效应[J].心理学报,2003,35(1):112-119. 被引量:3
  • 6JOHNSON M K, RAYE C L. Reality Monitoring [ J ]. Psychological Review, 1981 (88) :67-85.
  • 7李晓燕.内源性锚定值对锚定效应影响的实验研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2008.
  • 8王晓庄,白学军.判断与决策中的锚定效应[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(1):37-43. 被引量:71
  • 9PRATKANIS A R. The attitude heuristic and selective fact identification[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1988 (27) :257-263.
  • 10Charles M. Judd and Laurie James-Hawkins, Vincent Yzerbyt. Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment: Understanding the Relations Between Judgments of Competence and Warmth[J] . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2005 (89) : 899-913.

二级参考文献59

  • 1Adair, L. W., & Weingart, L. (2007). The timing and function of offers in U.S. and Japanese Negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1056 - 1068.
  • 2Ash, K. I., & Jennifer, W. (2008). Hindsight bias in insight and mathematical problem-solving: evidence of different reconstruction mechanisms for metacognitive vs. situational judgments. Memory & Cognition, 36, 822 - 837.
  • 3Brewer, N. T., & Chapman, G.. B. (2002). The fragile basic anchoring effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 65 - 77.
  • 4Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G.. B., Schwartz, J.A., & Bergus, G.. R. (2007). The influence of irrelevant anchors on the judgments and choices of doctors and patients. Medical Decision Making, 27, 203 -211.
  • 5Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In: T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman, Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment.(pp. 120 - 138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391-396.
  • 7Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Are adjustments insufficient? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 447-460.
  • 8Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: Differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 199 - 212.
  • 9Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006).The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychology Science, 17, 311 - 318.
  • 10Epley, N., & I(eysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327 - 339.

共引文献83

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部