在“辩”与“不辩”之间实现自然辩证法的新发展

Achieving the New Development of Dialectics of Nature between the "Debate" and "Non-debate"

自20世纪90年代以来,有关自然辩证法的争辩风起云涌,大体包括称谓之辩、研究范式之辩、学科性质之辩、形态之辩、正本清源之辩等等。但是如何避免称谓之辩掩盖其他争辩,以构建正本清源之辩为牵引的争辩序列;如何避免忽略自然辩证法研究内容本身,抛弃自然辩证法对人和自然关系及科学技术发展现实的反思特性等问题;如何在争辩中坚守"不辩",即树立鲜明的旗帜、坚定明确的态度、以陈述的方式回应有关自然辩证法的种种争辩;如何在"辩"与"不辩"之中谋求自然辩证法的新发展,关键在于维持"辩"与"不辩"之间的张力,做到辩之有力,不辩有理。只有这样,我们才能在充分认识自然辩证法新发展的基础上,真正实现新发展,促进自然辩证法学科建设。

Since the 20th century 90＇s, the debate about Dialectics of Nature surging, in general,including the debate of the subject name, the debate of the research paradigm,the debate of the subject nature,the debate of morphology,the debate of the root of the problem and so on. But how to avoid the debate of the subject name to cover up the other debate that in order to get to the debate of the root of the problem as a draw to build the debate sequence;how to avoid ignoring the content itself of Dialectics of Nature, abandoning the characteristics of reflection on the relationship between humans and nature ,and the reality of scientific and technological development of the issues such as; how to stick to ＂nondebate＂in the debate; that is to establish a distinctive flag, firm clear attitude, respond to all the debate about Dialectics of Nature in statement way; how to seek new development of dialectics of nature between the ＂debate＂ and ＂non-debate＂, the key is to maintain the tension between the ＂debate＂ and ＂non-debate＂, to achieve the strong debate, rational non-debate. Only in this way can we fully understand the new developments in Dialectics of Nature,and achieve the truly new development, and promote construction of the subject.