期刊文献+

国际法中的特别法优先原则 被引量:10

Lex Specialis Rule in International Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 国际法规则的冲突是国际法不成体系的重要表现,特别法优先原则强调适用更特殊、更具体的特别法规则,是解决这种冲突的重要方法。冲突确实存在与规则属于同一事项构成了该原则适用的基本条件,而调整事项和规则所涉及的缔约方则构成确定一般法和特别法的参考因素。 Norm conflicts constitute a vital aspect of the fragmentation of international law. The principle of lex specialis requires the more specific norm be applied when two or more international norms are in conflict. It is an important way to solve the norm conflicts in international law, and should be closely considered both in theory and practice. There exist indeed conflicts and the subject matters of general law and special law are the same are the two preconditions to apply the principle of lex specialis. If the application of one international norm will lead to the violation of another, or the party to the norms cannot satisfy the requirements of the two norms in the same time, it can be thought that the conflict really exits. Norm Conflict is mainly due to the lack of both legislative and judicial bodies in the highest level in contemporary international society. The criterion of the same subject matter should be interpreted in a broad way. If two different norms or sets of norms can be invoked in regard to a same problem, or as a result of interpretation, the relevant norms seem to point to different directions when they are applied by a party, such criterion has been satisfied. Besides, the application of the principle of lex specialis cannot violate the preemptory norm of international law, and there should be no special way provided by related norms to solve such conflict. As to the criterion to determine whether the law is general or special, if the subject matter of one norm is more specific than that of another, it can be said that the former is the lex specialis of the latter. The contracting parties to different norms can also help to determine general or special law. A special norm may be considered as an application of a general one in a given circumstance, or it may be considered as a modification, overruling or setting aside of the latter. Anyway, the application of a special norm does not necessarily mean the general one is no longer valid. It is generally held that international treaties are lex specialis while international customs are legi generali. The differentiation of lex specialis and legi generali exists both within one international treaty and among different treaties, which provides a broad space for the principle of lex specialis to be applied in international law.
作者 廖诗评
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期186-195,共10页 Chinese Journal of Law
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"国际法治与和谐世界构建研究"(项目号08CFX053)的阶段性成果
关键词 特别法优先原则 国际法规则冲突 国际法不成体系 条约法 lex specialis rule, norm conflict in international law, fragmentation of international law, law of treaties
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1[意]彼得罗·彭梵得 黄风译.《罗马法教科书》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1992年版.第52、53页.
  • 2Anja Lindroos, Addressing Norm Conflicts in a Fragmented Legal System : The Doctrine of Lex Speeialis, 74 Nor. J. Int'lL. 35-36 (2005).
  • 3[德]卡尔·拉伦茨 陈爱娥译.《法学方法论》[M].商务印书馆,2003年版.第142页.
  • 4G. Fitzmaurice, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951-1954: Treaty Interpretation and other Treaty Points, 28 BYIL 236 (1951).
  • 5C. Wilfred Jenks, The Conflict of Law--making Treaties, 30 BYIL 426 (1953).
  • 6United Nations, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 125.
  • 7V. Czaplinski & G. Danilenko, Conflict of Norms in International Law, 21 NYIL 13 (1990).
  • 8[比]约斯特·鲍威林.《国际公法规则之冲突:WTO法与其他国际法规则如何联系》,周忠海等译,法律出版社2005年版,第198页.
  • 9I.C.J. Reports 1998, p. 68.
  • 10Commentaries on the Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, Official Records of the General Assembly (2001), UN Doc. A/56/10 Supplement 10, p. 358.

二级参考文献58

  • 1.DSU第3条第7款[Z].,..
  • 2WT/DS54/R, WT/DS55/R, WT/DS59/R, WT/DS64/R,adopted on 23 July 1998,paras 14.29 - 14.36 and 14.97 - 14.99.
  • 3Lorand Barlets, Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, at Journat of World Trade 35(3), 2001 ,pp.508- 510.
  • 4WT/DS22/AB/R, 21 February 1997, at p. 11.
  • 5Draft Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, MTN.TNC/W/FA, 20 December 1991, p. T.3.
  • 6BISD 36S/268,adopted 7 November 1989,para.3.
  • 7BISD 36S/135,adopted 22 November 1989,para.1.3.
  • 8BISD 36S/306,adopted 2 November 1989,para.1.3.
  • 9WT/DS22,17 Octcber 1996.
  • 10WT/DS21/5, 23 July 1999.

共引文献293

引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部