期刊文献+

转喻与语境:“What’s X doing Y?”构式转喻思维的限制性因素 被引量:13

Metonymy and situation:Contextual constraints on metonymic thinking of "What’s X doing Y?" construction
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从认知语用角度,考察具体说话语境对"What’s X doing Y?"构式转喻思维的影响和制约作用。第一,探讨该构式规约地存在转喻思维的语境条件,指出该构式在不知而问的语境下不存在转喻;只有在明知故问,话语目的不是询问信息的语境下才存在转喻。第二,探讨该构式转喻思维两域操作和多域操作的语境条件,指出即使说话人用该构式来转喻性地表示不满或担忧,但若只是出于担心或惊讶而发出的自言自语,该构式的转喻操作仅为两域操作,只有在间接请求身边的人去阻止构式所涉及的行为的条件下,该构式才为多域操作。第三,探讨"doing"在不同语境中的功能变化。第四,考察具体说话语境与规约性语境的区别。 Taking a cognitive-pragmatic approach, this paper focuses on the contextual constraints on the metonymic thinking of 'What’s X doing Y?' construction. First, we explore the conditions for the conventional metonymic thinking of 'What’s X doing Y?' construction. It is argued that the construction involves no metonymic thinking in cases where the speaker only wants to get information. Secondly, we discuss under what circumstances the metonymic thinking of the construction will involve either two domains or three domains. Even if the speaker uses the construction to show metonymically his dissatisfaction, so long as the speaker only talks to himself or just speaks out of surprise, then the metonymic thinking will only involve two domains. If the speaker indirectly asks the person beside him to stop the action as expressed by the construction, then the metonymy in the construction will involve three domains. Thirdly, we discuss the different functions of the verb 'doing' in different contexts. Finally, we draw attention to the difference between specific conversational context and conventional context.
作者 陈香兰 申丹
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期104-108,共5页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 教育部人文社科项目"语言中的高层转喻思维机制研究"(项目号:09YJA740022)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 2Croft, W. & A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 3Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 4Ibanez, R., F. Jose &O. Velasco. 2003. High-level metonymy and linguistic structure [A]. In C. Inchaurralde & C. Floren (eds.). Interaction and Cognition in Linguistics[C]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 189-210.
  • 5Kay, P. & C. Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction [J]. Language 75: 1-33.
  • 6Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical Prerequisites [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • 7Langacker, R. 1991. Foundations ofCognitiveGrammar. Vol. 2. Descriptive Application [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

同被引文献215

引证文献13

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部