期刊文献+

费耶阿本德的不可通约与不可比理论研究 被引量:2

The study of Feyerabend's incommensurability and incomparability theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 费耶阿本德的思想是以对不可通约的运思而展开的。不可通约引起的最大问题是传统之间的比较问题,费耶阿本德通过阐释不可通约与不可比的关系,澄清了不可通约并不等于不可比,不可通约的传统之间存在着比较。不可通约的思想既反对绝对主义,也反对极端相对主义,费耶阿本德要消除的正是要么客观主义,要么相对主义的绝对对立的状况。 Feyerabend' s thought with incommensurability thought evolve, The most question of incommensurability is between tradition comparison problem, Through explaining the relation of incommensurability and incomparability, Feyerabend clarify incommensurability is not equal incomparability, there are comparison among incommensurable tradition. Incommensurable thought not oppose absolutism, but oppose extremity relativism, Feyerabend' s thought exactly resolve either objectivism or relativism absolutely opposite status.
作者 牛秋业
出处 《北方论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期117-120,共4页 The Northern Forum
基金 山东省社科规划研究项目<费耶阿本德的不可通约性理论研究>(05CZZ01)系列成果之一
关键词 不可通约 不可比 费耶阿本德 Incommensurability incomparability comparability
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Howard Sankey, The Incommensurability Thesis [ M ]. Avebury press Ltd, 1994.
  • 2[美]保罗·法伊尔阿本德.自由社会中的科学[M].兰征,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1990.
  • 3Feyerabend, Problems of Empiricism: Philosophical papers, Vol. 2[ C]. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  • 4Howard Sankey, Rationality, Relativism and Incommensurability [ M]. Ashgatepress, 1997.
  • 5Beyond Reason: Essays on the philosophy of paul Feyerabend[ C ]. Edited by Gonzalo Munevar, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
  • 6John Preston, FEYERABEND: Philosophy, Science and Society [ M ]. Polity press, 1997.
  • 7Feyerabend, Realism, Rationalism, and. scientific, method: Philosophical papers, [ C]. Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  • 8[美]伯恩斯坦.超越客观主义和相对主义[M].北京:光明日报出版社,1992.

共引文献3

同被引文献25

  • 1邓晓芒.杨祖陶译黑格尔《精神哲学》的意义[J].博览群书,2006(6):33-36. 被引量:3
  • 2王书明.费耶阿本德的生平著述及其研究概况[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,20(12):90-92. 被引量:1
  • 3郭颖颐.中国现代思想中的唯科学主义[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1998.66,4,48,52,66,50,51,59,63,131.
  • 4Bazghandi,P.Hamrah,S.Z..The principles of teaching science based on the ideas of Feyerabend regarding the nature of science and the manner of its expansion[J].Procedia,2011(29):969-975.
  • 5Erduran,S..Beyond philosophical confusion; establishing the role of philosophy of chemistry in chemical education research[J].J. Bal.Sci.Edu.,2009(8):5 - 14.
  • 6McComas W.F..The nature of science in science education:rationals and strategies[M].London:Kluwer academic publishers,2000.
  • 7Feyerabend, P.. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge [C]. In Radner, M. and S. Winokur(eds.). Analysis of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science,Volume 4. Minnepolis:University ofMinnesota Press. 1970. pp.17-130.
  • 8Feyerabend, P.. Against Method[M]. London: New Left Books. 1975.
  • 9Feyerabend, P.. Wider den Methodenzwang. Skizze einer anarchistischen Erkenntnistheorie [M]. Translated by H. Vetter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 1976.
  • 10Feyerabend, P.. Wider den Methodenzwang[M]. Translated by H. Vetter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 1983.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部