城市化促进技术创新的机制及证据被引量：50

Theoretical mechanism and evidence of the technology innovation facilitated by the urbanization

导出

摘要创新的作用日显突出,提升技术创新能力是实现可持续发展的重要途径。城市相对于乡村的多种优势特征,有利于技术创新的产生;城市化创造的良好环境,能够加速创新扩散。相关分析及因果检验显示:城市化与技术创新高度正相关,城市化构成技术创新水平提高的格兰杰原因;城市规模越大,创新能力越强。创新投入产出模型的时序及面板数据分析发现,城市化对技术创新具有正向促进效应,城市规模、开放程度及地区差异也对创新产出产生显著影响。结论对于合理推进城市化、培育技术创新优势具有启示意义。 Innovation plays a more and more prominent role in the society. It is an important way for the sustainable development according to enhancing innovation capability. Comparing with the village,characters of cities are propitious to the innovation. Urbanization creates favorable conditions for innovation diffusion. The correlation analysis shows that urbanization is highly positive correlated with technology innovation. Causality tests reveal the Granger causality between urbanization and technology innovation. Innovation capability is accordant with the city size. Empirical analysis indicates that urbanization facilitates technology innovation. City size,openness and regional differences also affect the output of innovation. In the end,recommendations for promoting urbanization and fostering innovation advantage are discussed.

作者程开明

机构地区浙江工商大学统计与数学学院

出处《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期26-34,共9页 Science Research Management

基金浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(编号:07CGLJ001ZQ 期限:2007-2009 以及"新中国成立60周年"专项研究期限:2009.04-2009.12) 浙江工商大学青年人才基金项目资助(编号:Q09-2 期限:2009-2010)

关键词城市化技术创新理论机制投入产出模型 urbanization technology innovation theoretical mechanism input-output model

分类号 F062.4 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Carlino G, Chatterjee S and Hunt R. Knowledge Spillovers and the New Economy of Cities[ EB/OL]. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Papers, 2001.
2Pred, Allan R. The Spatial Dynamics of U. S. Urban - Industrial Growth, 1800 - 1914: Interpretive and Theoretical Essays [ M]. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 1966.
3Higgs R. American Inventiveness : 1870 - 1920 [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1971,79(3 ) :661 -667.
4贝洛克.城市与经济发展(中译本)[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,1991:210-217.
5Jacobs J. The Economy of Cities[ M]. New York: Random House, 1969:116 - 127.
6Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M and Henderson R. Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economic, 1993,108 (3) : 577 - 598.
7Feldman Maryann P. and David B. Audretsch. Innovation in Cities : Science - Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition[ J]. European Economic Review, 1999,43 (2) :409 -429.
8Glaeser E.L. Learning in cities[ J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1999,46(2) :254 277.
9Chariot, S. and Duranton, G.. Communication externalities in cities, Journal of Urban Economies[ J ]. 2004,56 (3) :581 -613.
10Carlino Gerald A. , Satyajit Chatterjee, Robert M. Hunt. Urban density and the rate of invention[ J ]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2007,61 (3) :389 - 419.

二级参考文献27

1Nicholas Crafts, Anthony J. Venables, 2001,Globalization in History: a Geographical Perspective, http://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/ajv/craven4.pdf.
2Paul Krugman. 1991. Geography and Trade, MIT Press.
3Fujita, M., et al. 1999, the Spatial Economy,Cambridge, MIT Press.
4Richard Baldwin, et al. 2003, Economic Geography and Public Policy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
5Maskell, p. and A. Malmberg, 1999, Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness, Cambridge Journal of Economics 99.
6Lilach Nachum, David Keeble. 1999. NeoMashallian Nodes, Global Networks and Firm Competitiveness: the Media Cluster of Central London. ESRC Center for Business Research, University Cambridge, Working Paper No. 138.
7G. Barba Navaretti & A. J. Venables, 2004,Multinational Firms in the World Economy, Princeton,Princeton University Press.
8Amin A. and Thrift N. 1992, Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16 (4) : pp571-587.
9Keeble D. and Wilkinson F. 1999, Collective Learning and Knowledge Development in the evolution of Regional Clusters of High-technology SMEs in Europe, Regional Studies 33(4) : pp295-303
10Paul Krugman. 1980. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade, American Economic Review 70 (5) , pp. 950-9.