期刊文献+

教师教育评价的道德诉求与伦理规范 被引量:5

Moral Requirements and Ethical Norms of the Teacher Educational Evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 为使教师教育评价的工具理性更加合乎价值理性的追求,将评价活动开展得更加合乎伦理道德要求,有必要从教育伦理规范的视角来审视教师教育评价过程中的各种现象和关系。具体言之,教师教育评价应以高素质教师的标准为指导原则;应以"服务和指导教师教育"为最终目的;在教师教育的评价内容方面如教师教育课程的开设、教师教育管理、教师教育主体等方面都应当给予伦理道德的关注;教师教育评价过程应做到公开、公正、公平;评价主体应对教师教育和评价活动有深入思考和远见卓识,懂得教师教育评价规律,人格高洁,处事公正,实事求是;评价结果方面,要正确使用评价结果,以提高教师教育质量为宗旨,避免评价结果的滥用和误用。 In order to make the teacher education evaluation (TEE) serve well promoting teacher education, it is necessary to study TEE according to a moral and ethical perspective. Specifically, TEE should set up high standards and expectations for teachers. It should aim at providing services and suggestions for teacher education. Those evaluators should have deep insights of teacher education and are fair - minded. TEE should be carried out openly and impartially. It should take moral and ethical elements into account during its implementation. The results of TEE should be used to improve the quality of teacher education.
作者 田爱丽
出处 《教师教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期15-19,共5页 Teacher Education Research
基金 新世纪教学研究所2008年"高等学校教学资源建设"中"高校师德师风建设"研究的成果之一
关键词 教师教育 评价 教师教育评价 伦理规范 teacher education, evaluation, teacher education evaluation, ethical norm
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Morris M, Cohn R. Program evaluation and ethical challenges: A national survey[J]. Evaluation Review, 1993,(17),621 - 642.
  • 2蔡敏.美国教育评价的伦理规范建设及其启示[J].外国教育研究,2005,32(6):18-21. 被引量:26
  • 3华东师大书记及校长:教师应具有更高的道德水准,http://www.chinaedunet.com/jcjy/mxft/2007/8/content_102323.shtml.
  • 4苏霍姆林斯基著.把整个心灵献给孩子[A].节选自单中惠,朱镜人主编.外国教育经典解读[C].上海:上海教育出版社,2004,312.
  • 5Coombes, Phyllida, Danaher, M. J., Danaher,P. A. (1992). The Ethics of Educational Evaluation. Social Alternatives. Oct. 92, Vol. 11, Issue 3.
  • 6Goldie, J. (2006). AMEE Education guide no. 29: evaluating educational programmes. Medical Teachers. 28(3). pp. 210 - 224.
  • 7Coombes, Phyllida, Danaher, M. J., Danaher, P. A. (1992). The Ethics of Educational Evaluation. Social Alternatives. Oct. 92, Vol. 11, Issue 3.
  • 8The American Evaluation Association. Guiding Principles for Evaluators. http://www. eval. org/ Publications/GuidingPrinciples. asp. 2008 - 01 - 13.

二级参考文献6

  • 1House E R. Professional evaluation:Social impact and political consequences[M].Newbury Park,CA:SAGE Publications, 1993. 163-172.
  • 2Anastasi A. Psychological testing [M].Upper SaddleRiver, NJ : Prentice Hall, 1988. 48-52.
  • 3Salvia J,Ysseldyke J E. Assessment[M]. Boston,MA:Houghton Mifflin Company,1995. 66-71.
  • 4Perloff R, Pefloff E. Values, ethics, and standards in evaluation[J]. New Directions for Program Evaluation,1980,(7).
  • 5Morris M,Cohn R. Program evaluation and ethical challenges:A national survey[J]. Evaluation Review,1993, (17) : 621-642.
  • 6Kirkhart K E. Analyzing mental health evaluation:Moral and ethical dimensions[J]. Evaluation and Program Planning, 1985, (8) : 13-25.

共引文献26

同被引文献42

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部