期刊文献+

最优董事会结构的再检验——基于咨询服务角度的思考 被引量:1

A re-check of best board structure——from the angle of advisory service
下载PDF
导出
摘要 众多研究表明,结构精简和独立性强是理想的董事会结构。对于某些类型的企业而言,较大的董事会,内部董事比例较高的董事会是趋于最优的。有一些较为复杂的企业,诸如多元化经营、规模较大、负债率较高的企业,他们有较为强烈的咨询建议需求,此类企业将会更多地受益于拥有一个规模更大的董事会,特别是拥有更多的独立董事,从而其可以受益于此类独立董事的丰富行业经验和专长,而且对于某些内部人持有关键企业专有信息的企业而言,例如高研发强度企业,他们会更加受益于拥有一个内部董事比例较高的董事会。 Many researches show that simple structure and independence are the essentials of an ideal board structure.For an enterprise that is engaged in specialized production,an ideal board structure should have a high percentage of directors from its own organization;for a big enterprise that involves diversified business and high debt ratio,it is more beneficial to have a board structure with independent directors so as to benefit from their rich professional experience and knowledge;for an enterprise focusing on high-tech research,it is more suitable to have a board structure composed of the internal members who possess the key enterprise information.
出处 《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期44-51,共8页 Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1Weisbach M.Outside directors and CEO turnover[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1988,20:421-460.
  • 2Borokhovich K,ParrinoR,Trapani T.Outside directors and CEO selection[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1996,31:337-355.
  • 3Brickley J,Coles J,Terry R.Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1994,35:371-390.
  • 4Byrd J,Hickman K.Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1992,32:195-222.
  • 5Cotter J,Shivdasani A,Zenner M.Do outside directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offer contests?[J] Journal of Financial Economics,1997,43:195-218.
  • 6Lipton M,Lorsch J.A modest proposal for improved corporate governance[J].Business Lawyer,1992,1:59-77.
  • 7Jensen M.The modern industrial revolution,exit and the failure of internal control systems[J].Journal of Finance,1993,48:831-880.
  • 8Yermack D.Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1996,40:185-212.
  • 9Eisenberg T,Sundgren S,Wells M.Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1998,48:35-54.
  • 10Wu Y.The impact of public opinion on board structure changes,director progression,and CEO turnover:evidence from CalPERS corporate governance program[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2004,10:199-227.

同被引文献45

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部