期刊文献+

诉讼参与人的情态表达分析及其人际意义 被引量:3

Analysis of the Modal Expressions of Lawsuit Participants and their Interpersonal Meanings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以Halliday系统功能语言学为理论依据,以刑事审判话语为研究对象。首先,结合具体刑事审判语境,整体考察一场刑事审判中诉讼参与人的情态表达及其人际意义。然后,又具体分析公诉人和被告人的情态表达特点及其言语实现方式。揭示刑事审判中诉讼参与人使用情态表达的总体趋向,说明诉讼参与人对情态表达的选择与他们的特定角色有关,并探求其法律上的相关解释和依据。 Applying Halliday's systematic functional linguistics as theoretical basis, this paper carries out researches on discourses in criminal lawsuits. Firstly, using actual courtroom discourses, the paper holistically investigates the modal expressions of lawsuit participants and their interpersonal meanings in a criminal lawsuit. It then analyzes the features of the modal expressions of the prosecutors and defendants, in an effort to unveil the general trend of lawsuit participants' use of modal expressions, illustrate that their choices of modal expressions are related to their respective roles and search for their legal explanations and proofs
作者 李诗芳
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2010年第2期120-123,127,共5页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究资助项目(08E067)
关键词 情态表达 人际意义 刑事审判 诉讼参与人 modal expressions interpersonal meanings criminal iustice lawsuit partieioant
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Bybee J,Susanne F. eds. Modality in grammar and discourse [M]. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 1995: 2.
  • 2Quirk R. et al. A comprehensive grammar of the English language [M]. London: Longman, 1985: 294.
  • 3Fowler R. Linguistic criticism [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996: 168.
  • 4Halliday M A K. An introduction to functional grammar [M]. London: Edward Armold, 1994: 90, 89.
  • 5Finegan E. Language: its structure and use (3rd edition) [M]. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1999.
  • 6胡壮鳞.系统功能语法概论[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,1989:119.
  • 7Thompson G. Introducing functional grammar [M]. London: Edward Armold, 1996: 60.
  • 8Hodge D, Kress G. Language and ideology [M]. London & New York:Routledge, 1990.
  • 9李诗芳.中文民事判决书的情态意义分析[J].现代外语,2005,28(3):272-278. 被引量:7
  • 10李诗芳.中文刑事判决书语体的人际意义研究[J].外语学刊,2008(2):60-64. 被引量:8

二级参考文献28

  • 1龙卫球.民法总论[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2002..
  • 2Bybee, J. & F. Susanne (eds.). 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse [C]. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
  • 3Conley, J. M. & W. M. O'Barr. 1998. Just Word [M]. The University of Chicago Press.
  • 4Finegan, E. 1999. Language: Its Structure and Use (3^rd edition) [M]. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  • 5Fowler, R. 1996. Linguistic Criticism [M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • 6Givon, T. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar [M]. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
  • 7Halliday, M. A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Armold.
  • 8Halliday, M. A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Armold.
  • 9Holmes, J. 1984. Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures [J]. Te Reo 27.
  • 10Hubler, A. 1983. Understatements and Hedges in English[M]. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.

共引文献39

同被引文献66

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部